Injury Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if only one of Walker/Stones is available, we shouldn’t have to play Fernandinho as CB/RB at least
 
Stones & Walker both training
giphy-downsized-large.gif
 
We won't risk them both if they're not properly ready, not because of fitness concerns though, its worth it in that respect, but because Pep isn't going to want to likely have to use 2 subs on defenders, it severely limits our options off the bench if we need to use it. One might start though jf they can do at least 45, walker would be the most beneficial to have, his pace is vital. If ake isn't fit I'd even play him at centre back with laporte
 
We won't risk them both if they're not properly ready, not because of fitness concerns though, its worth it in that respect, but because Pep isn't going to want to likely have to use 2 subs on defenders, it severely limits our options off the bench if we need to use it. One might start though jf they can do at least 45, walker would be the most beneficial to have, his pace is vital. If ake isn't fit I'd even play him at centre back with laporte
We risked both Stones in the Atletico home leg and Walker in Madrid. Walker will play and that to me settles my nerves a bit as he will cover Ferns lack of pace if Stones doesn’t make it.
 
We risked both Stones in the Atletico home leg and Walker in Madrid. Walker will play and that to me settles my nerves a bit as he will cover Ferns lack of pace if Stones doesn’t make it.
Yeah only one both times though and in a competition where we had 5 subs. Pep won't risk 2 together and almost wiping out our attacking options from the bench should they be required. One but not both and I'd sooner it be walker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.