Kippaxpete
Well-Known Member
Oh that twat!Any twat with a comb over
Oh that twat!Any twat with a comb over
The “on” variations are all services, so possibly a legacy of saying the passenger is on a bus “service” and also you would say you were on a car “journey” rather than in one. Additionally if you were travelling on a specific route number it would sound odd to say you were “in the 192”. That’s my theory anyway.why do we say...
"in" a car?
everything else is "on"...
on a bus
on a train
on a boat
on a tram
on a plane
et catera
in point of fact,
grammatically, shouldn't they all be "in"?
hmmm.The object doesn’t move whilst the force keeps being applied ad infinitum.
The “on” variations are all services, so possibly a legacy of saying the passenger is on a bus “service” and also you would say you were on a car “journey” rather than in one. Additionally if you were travelling on a specific route number it would sound odd to say you were “in the 192”. That’s my theory anyway.
The force never stops, but isn’t strong enough to move the object?hmmm.
did i ask it the wrong way round...
what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object?
i know someone who might disagreeThe force never stops, but isn’t strong enough to move the object?
Unstoppable means endless.i know someone who might disagree
Probably the pay chequeWhy do people work so hard to achieve the title doctor only to be called Mr when they get to consultant level?