BillyShears said:The figure mooted to take Walcott was 3 million pounds according to that charlatan Pearce. Another in a long line of clueless moronic decisions the chest beating little Englander made whilst managing City.
That was the figure Wigley thought we should be prepared to pay for him, not one that Southampton would have sold for (he went for five times as much months later). Pearce had never seen him so couldnt justify spending the money.
FWIW Walcott was being chased by Arsenal, Chelsea etc. We would never have stood a chance if we did agree a fee.