feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Agreed. A nuclear attack would trigger international disaster, whilst a ground war would more than likely fail / take decades. There is a reason that Iran has not been conquered since the Mongol period.
This is why it will be nothing more than sabre rattling with some ship sunk and drones lost. The yanks and NATO didn’t have the stomach to get involved with Syria as it would have been a disaster. They pick and chose the easy walk over wars like Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, or least they think that as the exit strategy from each one has resulted in more of a shit storm happening than the military action itself.
Taking on Iran would be reckless for where it could end up, they’ve been causing mischief for decades and never faced any other recourse but sanctions.