west didsblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Oct 2011
- Messages
- 32,266
Probably easier to go round to his house.Is it right to bomb Jerusalem to bits to arrest him?
Probably easier to go round to his house.Is it right to bomb Jerusalem to bits to arrest him?
That's going to happen, is it?Probably easier to go round to his house.
Doubt it.That's going to happen, is it?
That's great but what I meant was condemnation of what is really happening under guise of 'getting rid of Hamas'France and Switzerland on the Security Council voted for a ceasefire, with plenty of support from Western governments (and Eastern).
That's a problem, isn't it?Doubt it.
Certainly not while Israel has Netanyahu as PM because cunts like King form his core support.
China (occupying Tibet, threatening Taiwan and committing cultural genocide against its own Muslim population) and Russia (massacring Ukrainian civilians) also voted for a ceasefire as members of the same Security Council that hasn't once mentioned the October 7th massacres.France and Switzerland on the Security Council voted for a ceasefire, with plenty of support from Western governments (and Eastern).
Reasonable to conclude in who's opinion?He’s describing a technocracy divided along blood lines rather than intellect.
Any nation that considers a genetic trait to make the person less worthy of equality is in trouble. It’s not just in Israel you see these prejudices either, but perhaps only might we think Israel are acting on them given how cheap an Arab life is seemingly deemed.
At the start of this when I read that Israelis were stopping their cars and kicking the corpses of the terrorists and how their bodies had been left but the bodies of Jews removed did I think they don’t see the Arabs as human and whilst that thought had traction this will never end.
For balance it’s also reasonable to conclude Hamas do not value Jewish life either but two wrongs don’t make a right.
Not sure if you’re mistaking me for someone who defends the settler movement or thinks that their actions are in any way justifiable.That's a problem, isn't it?
Especially if the definition of antisemitism includes likening Israeli policies to that of the Nazis.
He's talking about Untermensch - and not just the Hamas criminals of October 7th - while settlers seem quite happy to justify landgrabbing not just because of a supposed ancient right to the land but because they need living space. Lebensraum.
Lebensraum as a justification for Israeli settlements
We were fortunate when we occupied the West Bank because had we not done so, where would we have come to live? And who knows how high housing prices would have risen?www.haaretz.com
I get the parallel with other Islamist terrorist groups, but surely the UK/US foreign policy direction of the last 20 years has taught us that kinetic military action doesn't really keep us safe or even particularly diminish the threat?I'd guess it's because 'decent nations' have suffered thousands of deaths and injuries after Islamist terrorist acts on 9/11, 7/7 and the Arena bombing.
Of course you can't wipe out an ideology but you can wipe out the infrastructure that supports the ideology.
Hamas have cynically hidden behind the people they're supposed to be representing and their hope is that the more of those innocents die, the better it will be for them, as the more the pressure will grow for a ceasefire that protects them. If they really cared about Gaza, they'd negotiate to give up their weapons and leave the area, allowing someone who does care more about the poor innocents to come to a political solution that stops the slaughter.
I dont think there has been anyone who does in the whole thread has there ?Not sure if you’re mistaking me for someone who defends the settler movement or thinks that their actions are in any way justifiable.