Difference being Sancho decided that before even playing for us.There is the similarity that they both decided they didn't want to work with Pep and asked for a move.
100%, hasn't hurt City in the slightestThere is the similarity that they both decided they didn't want to work with Pep and asked for a move.
He still didn’t refuse to play or travel like Sancho didYou make it sound like he was doing us a favour ‘turning out’ rather that doing his job and playing in cup final for the club who pay his wages. He should have been grateful for the start seeing as he was agitating for a move at the time..
There is the similarity that they both decided they didn't want to work with Pep and asked for a move.
Nail on headIt wasn’t the case they didn’t want to work with Pep.
Sancho didn’t get picked for the pre season tour and spat his dummy out. Decided he wanted to go and then just didn’t turn up for training. He hadn’t even played for City in one game at this point. No one is having a jumped up little prick like that near our club. He got sold because of his attitude, and there was never going to be any way back from that. Then he went Utd too, which sums him up.
Sane got courted by Bayern, being from Germany he fancied it, put a transfer request in, but he carried on playing. At least he actually did play for us too and was very successful.
The big difference though, Sancho is crap now, Sane is still decent.
That’s how you get famous on Twitter, for sure! ;)Why are so many on here so obsessed with transfer info coming from Twitter accounts? Unless your a teenager or a halfwit following and posting info from these accounts on here Is actually ridiculous. Just about anyone could set up an account and start copying and pasting transfer crap all day.
I would start worrying if they are genuine linksOpening this thread to page 1808 and seeing Antony and Sancho’s names were a worry
Absolutely, I totally agreeHe still didn’t refuse to play or travel like Sancho did
Why not sancho? It’s not clicking for him at United but I’m sure if we got him we could get the best out of him. He can play both sides and fits perfectly the profile of a ball retention winger that we need.
The gripe United fans have with sancho is because he’s not as incisive and all action as players like Antony, rashford and garnacho. He prefers to combine and build play like a wide playmaker like Grealish.
Yes, we know how he left but he was 16-17, young and wanted exposure to 1st team football which we couldn’t offer. Now he’s more established and mature and could really be a great fit for us. Only issue I see is wages. I don’t know what United were doing giving him that high of wages.
Or it’s absolute bollox@tolmie's hairdoo I can only think of 1 reason why this has gone from done to tension..
A deal was initially agreed and then RB Leipzig wanted more cash like other clubs have tried to do with us before.
I will not be surprised to say City say FUCK OFF and walk away to teach Leipzig a lesson.
And with Dias, Stones, Akanji, Ake, Laporte.. can anyone really blame City?? We're already solid on CB's.. we don't really need 1 more especially with THB and Callum Doyle buybacks if they pan out.
Nobody has a scoobie what’s going on if you want to believe the bolloc posted on here on Twitter more fool youWould agreeing on a price for the house, and then getting quoted 15% more than previously agreed qualify as "absolute bollox"?
If yes, I agree with you!
Nobody has a scoobie what’s going on if you want to believe the bolloc posted on here on Twitter more fool you
So you’re the one with the Kaka tattoo:)I've learned the hard way to not believe anything until something is posted on City website.
Until then nothing is done!
If he’d stayed how many trophies would he have had my now?He had the chance to play under Pep and thought he knew better and moved on!