Said nothing about gifsAnyone using the phrase "Here We Go" should be banned permanently.
Said nothing about gifsAnyone using the phrase "Here We Go" should be banned permanently.
Said nothing about gifs
Anyone using the phrase "Here We Go" should be banned permanently.
Jacobs is a nobody in the industry, complete KFA and zero sources, he’s nicked all his “info” from Romano and hereTalks progressing, finalising terms, closing, preparing bid.
These lot are just full of shit all the time.
He changed his name on Twitter, used to claim to be ex MEN. Asked folk I know there at Hollinwood and guess what? Complete fantasist and Billy Liar99% sure that Existant fellow on X is a WUM but then he quote tweets a post he made last week about Cherki meeting Liverpool which only came out today from Ornstein.
Or was there reports about it last week too?
Apart from that all his posts look nonsense.
“Here we go” is soooo 2023What about ‘Let’s Launch’?
I actually did, but I'm just buzzing that we're going after full backs.I assume you mean mythical left back, lol.
Thank fuck. It isn’t just me.Anyone using the phrase "Here We Go" should be banned permanently.
Because if we can't agree terms with the player, there's no point in approaching his clubDon't understand why we would be agreeing terms with the player before agreeing a fee with wolves.
He is going to be getting a significant pay rise from what he is on now so he's not going to turn it down.
And, once you’ve got your meat hooks in the player, and it’s a tidy deal, they often help push for the move!Because if we can't agree terms with the player, there's no point in approaching his club
We always seem to get the players boxed off first before agreeing a fee.Don't understand why we would be agreeing terms with the player before agreeing a fee with wolves.
He is going to be getting a significant pay rise from what he is on now so he's not going to turn it down.
“Tapping up” is still hypothetically against the rulesWe always seem to get the players boxed off first before agreeing a fee.
But in this case, we will clearly agree terms with the player. He isn't going to stay at wolves on half the pay city are offering becuase he wanted an extra 5k a week.Because if we can't agree terms with the player, there's no point in approaching his club
I've always wondered about that, when it gets reported Pep has spoken with the player many times etc.. If we ask the club's permission to speak with the player first. I'd like to think we do, but I don't know one way or the other.“Tapping up” is still hypothetically against the rules
But with the power growth of super agents, it’s now the industry standard
Like timewasting, it’s still there but nobody enforces it anymore
The last time I remember it actually coming into play was Van Dijk to the Cult
Southampton invoked their rights, informed the PL and told the Cult they were staring at a points deduction
As is their M.O. when faced with the consequences of their illegal actions, The Cult paid a £10m premium on the eventual transfer fee to make it all go away
Similar to when they paid us £1.1m to make the database hack disappear
They are the real cheats and scumbags, yet they honestly believe we should accept ethical lectures from them
Offended by everything, ashamed of nothing. It’s 100% true. Utter hypocritical scum
To be honest, lots of bollocks around as we know, pretty sure these things are always closer than reported and played out for the fans. As you say, we must have an indication of what fee is required, be wasting our time otherwise.Don't understand why we would be agreeing terms with the player before agreeing a fee with wolves.
He is going to be getting a significant pay rise from what he is on now so he's not going to turn it down.