LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Ah yes, the “snub” is a close cousin of the “united hijack”That's just before the player "snubs" us.
Ah yes, the “snub” is a close cousin of the “united hijack”That's just before the player "snubs" us.
That's just before the player "snubs" us.
I suspect the fact that Sterling was played in the CL final tells you all you need to know about City's desire to keep him.
Indeed, if they had such intimate knowledge of the Kane offer, it would be a huge story in itself that Sterling was being shown the door by us, certainly not confined to 14 characters on Twitter, burying the fucking lead.
It is mate, sometimes the words in my head don't flow through to the keyboard quite as intended.It's "burying the lede," isn't it?
I think you're bang on with this though. Can't see Sterling going anywhere, certainly not as a makeweight to that fucking omnishambles
A dying profession due to proprietors’ greed, and it shows in the state of modern print media. Some papers have barely trained cub reporters writing straight into pre-designed page boxes nowadays and published without any legal, factual or grammatical oversight. That has led to shockers like thisIt is mate, sometimes the words in my head don't flow through to the keyboard quite as intended.
That's what sub-editors are for!
I value kane 110-120 millionYep, I thought it sounded like nonsense. £100 million is about £15 million over what I think we should pay, but oddly enough nobody from City has asked me ;)
I suppose the temptation for Spurs is if it’s a one off payment hit up front and the interest that would save on loans too. I’d make that a take it or leave it offer. If they get more money over longer it’s probably worth less if you factor it over say three years.
Yen?I value kane 110-120 million
The thing is if sterling is not leaving this window with 2 years left and he nit willing to extend. Club might be tempted to sell. Hence the rumors. As newspaper calculate and fill in the gaps and make news. Even we can make rumors...All these 'informed' people yesterday flagging Sterling up as being offered as a potential Kane makeweight...
Indeed, if they had such intimate knowledge of the Kane offer, it would be a huge story in itself that Sterling was being shown the door by us, certainly not confined to 14 characters on Twitter, burying the fucking lead.
Throwing his name into the pot yesterday evidenced a wider zero knowledge, outside of the public knowledge of his unhappiness at not playing every week for City, the delayed contract talks.
People like Romano and others don't have the bottle to write Sterling's situation because they don't fucking know it - because they don't have any contacts at City.
They won't write Sterling is leaving, Sterling is quitting, Sterling is signing a new deal - a definitive statement - because it then leaves them immediately open to scrutiny and being exposed for the chancers they are.
Here's one - Sterling has told people he is not leaving City this summer.
To who? No one has any money.The thing is if sterling is not leaving this window with 2 years left and he nit willing to extend. Club might be tempted to sell. Hence the rumors. As newspaper calculate and fill in the gaps and make news. Even we can make rumors...