Please read my last post that explains that I simply used Chelsea owner as an example whereas all owners of whatever nationality are treated differently than city owner by the madia and UEFA.No one is beyond criticism
Just find it strange that city fans would engage in wild conspiracy theories about rival clubs finances given what we have been subject to and would then pick on fellow city fans for saying those conspiracies are wild ? And not understand that saying wild conspiracies are wild conspiracies is not the same as defending those clubs
Look at other conspiracies for example you can think it’s nuts to think the royals killed Diana or that Israel was involved in 9/11 and not be a royalist or pro Israel
Generally it’s accepted that the burden of proof is on those making accusations
And it’s generally accepted you don’t make accusations of the nature in public forums
Also if Chelsea are up to this sort of stuff why not City or other clubs ? After all Abramovich is small fry compared to our owner yet what’s everyone saying on here that we carnt sell anyone for decent money
Porro has a nonsensical buyout clause which is actually less than we paid for him
20m would be our second best sale after Kelechi. No chance.Yeah that boggles the mind. We could have easily fetched 20m+ on the market.
Yep pretty blatant it was a way of getting cash into Girona20m would be our second best sale after Kelechi. No chance.
As for the buy out being less than what we paid. I would say it's clear all is not what it seems with that transfer.
20m would be our second best sale after Kelechi. No chance.
As for the buy out being less than what we paid. I would say it's clear all is not what it seems with that transfer.
Good point. I meant of the last decade.Thought we got 21 million for SWP too ?
We have also made money through loan fees and potentially secured first refusal on players like Nuno Mendes.Yep pretty blatant it was a way of getting cash into Girona
Good point. I meant of the last decade.