Daz_Blue
Well-Known Member
Tolmie ..... are you hearing about anything else apart from Grealish and Kane? ...... if Laporte goes we need a replacement.Or you could have read my post at half five this morning ;)
Tolmie ..... are you hearing about anything else apart from Grealish and Kane? ...... if Laporte goes we need a replacement.Or you could have read my post at half five this morning ;)
Tolm said this morning "No more business after Grealish and Kane".Tolmie ..... are you hearing about anything else apart from Grealish and Kane? ...... if Laporte goes we need a replacement.
How much are we paying for alice ? Is it 100m ?Or you could have read my post at half five this morning ;)
They know there's a good chance we'll get Grealish AND Kane. They're embedding it into the public consciousness that we can only afford one so that there's more outrage when we sign both.See Talksport now debating why we've signed Grealish and not a striker when a striker was our priority.
The level at which the media are refusing to believe we will get Kane as well is astounding. Gallons and gallons of boiling piss on the horizon.
How much are we paying for alice ? Is it 100m ?
ThanksNo idea, expect it to be close enough to it.
Was thinking that this morning, well played sir.Txiki Blinders - seems apt, no?
Jack even has the cap!
How times have changed eh?If we get Grealish *and* Kane I don't think we can grumble, but does it not mean that someone will have to be sold or loaned? If a sale, the net spend should be surprisingly modest given that we have already raised big bucks by selling various players already.