Its the wum speaking here............

Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:
well how about, seeing as everyone keeps trying to work out how SWP gets in the team, we play 3-4-3 with Toure, Lescott and Terry as a centre back 3 with a left sided, right sided and central, and then use SWP and Bridge as a kind of wingback with Barry and Ireland in the middle, then Robbie, Ade/RSC, Tevez as the attackiing 3.

Now that of course is completely hypothetical and certainly not for every game but it could certainly work in some and would be a frightening prospect for the opposition ! Not a formation I would recommend but certainly close to the 3-5-2 that has been deployed by people in the past ?

Mr Hughes will never go three up front. However, I do admire your attack minded ethos there!
 
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:
well how about, seeing as everyone keeps trying to work out how SWP gets in the team, we play 3-4-3 with Toure, Lescott and Terry as a centre back 3 with a left sided, right sided and central, and then use SWP and Bridge as a kind of wingback with Barry and Ireland in the middle, then Robbie, Ade/RSC, Tevez as the attackiing 3.

Now that of course is completely hypothetical and certainly not for every game but it could certainly work in some and would be a frightening prospect for the opposition ! Not a formation I would recommend but certainly close to the 3-5-2 that has been deployed by people in the past ?

This would scare the Be-jesus out of teams like Stoke, Hull, Burnley, Wolves, Brum, Wigan, Portsmouth (another 6-0 perhaps) etc etc but would obviously be a bit gung-ho for the more able clubs. Interesting but I don't like the lack of Richards and Onouha. Would rather have Lescott Terry and Onouha as the back 3 and then be able to revert to 4-3-3 with Richards on for SWP and De-Jong on for Bridge or Lescott.
 
bluearmy71 said:
kippaxblue76 said:
Why don't you fuck off, if you don't want to believe him then thats fine, but until he's proven wrong lay off him.

Got all the prove i want as i have knew all his info before he posts and i knew about Taylor before he even joined the forum because of the internet and reading interviews which i suspect he did too get the same info so that is my reason for believing he is a attention seeker.


Find a news report dated before Spursmad gave information about Taylor. Just one. Until then, your argument isn't valid.
 
baldybouncer said:
Nixon_The_Bike_Thief said:
well how about, seeing as everyone keeps trying to work out how SWP gets in the team, we play 3-4-3 with Toure, Lescott and Terry as a centre back 3 with a left sided, right sided and central, and then use SWP and Bridge as a kind of wingback with Barry and Ireland in the middle, then Robbie, Ade/RSC, Tevez as the attackiing 3.

Now that of course is completely hypothetical and certainly not for every game but it could certainly work in some and would be a frightening prospect for the opposition ! Not a formation I would recommend but certainly close to the 3-5-2 that has been deployed by people in the past ?

Mr Hughes will never go three up front. However, I do admire your attack minded ethos there!

He did most of last season!!!
 
big blueballs said:
Project said:
Stuart Taylor wasnt on News Now before the deal happened, and wasn't on Google Blog Search. You can still check both of them with a date search.
maybe not but what i am saying is you can find all kinds of rumours and stories trawling various sites and blogs
also can i add that i am not having a pop at ITK's as like i said i enjoy there posts they are far better than the likes of "muffin or barm" thread etc but i do think for every proper ITK there are 10 who are just regurgitating other peoples blogs and various web sites articles/rumours

Believe me it takes a lot for me to believe that somebody is ITK. And to me there are at most 5 people on all of the City forums I visit that I would say are legit. And Spursmad is one of them. I understand the cynicism of people claiming to be ITK in general, but not for this particular one.
 
Project said:
big blueballs said:
maybe not but what i am saying is you can find all kinds of rumours and stories trawling various sites and blogs
also can i add that i am not having a pop at ITK's as like i said i enjoy there posts they are far better than the likes of "muffin or barm" thread etc but i do think for every proper ITK there are 10 who are just regurgitating other peoples blogs and various web sites articles/rumours

Believe me it takes a lot for me to believe that somebody is ITK. And to me there are at most 5 people on all of the City forums I visit that I would say are legit. And Spursmad is one of them. I understand the cynicism of people claiming to be ITK in general, but not for this particular one.

Out of interest who do you class as the other ITK so I can ignore the WUM ringpieces! Cheers
 
Cake said:
Project said:
Believe me it takes a lot for me to believe that somebody is ITK. And to me there are at most 5 people on all of the City forums I visit that I would say are legit. And Spursmad is one of them. I understand the cynicism of people claiming to be ITK in general, but not for this particular one.

Out of interest who do you class as the other ITK so I can ignore the WUM ringpieces! Cheers

happyblue on here is pretty clued up
 
See pointing spelling mistakes out and making out I am causing something I am not it's really sad look i said something on a forum to someone i believe to be looking for attention and as always you sad gits who spend all day waiting for more "info" of spursmad start teaming up against people because you don't like what they say and picking bits out off other posts and making out am a virgin can you not see that is sad,and if i write drivel than at least i don't look for attention or wait on every word someone with no prove of their info.Am not replying again as am getting to the level you want me to get you carry on following your "god" i couldn't give a shit but why don't you let others express there feelings than acting like i am aiming a gun at spursmad and throwing yourselves in front off him to protect him.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.