John Terry [Merged]

[Rammy Blue]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

[qu

and for terry to have alledgedly text bridge to "get me out of here" says to me theres more to this transfer

Seriously, do people honestly believe this stuff ? JT and Bridge arent even that close. Bridge wasnt even at his wedding.

Jody Morris was though.

thought jt through a leaving doo for bridge nad was qouted as been gutted that bridge had left.

in english please?

 

[Johnny Tabasco]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

[qu

and for terry to have alledgedly text bridge to "get me out of here" says to me theres more to this transfer

Seriously, do people honestly believe this stuff ? JT and Bridge arent even that close. Bridge wasnt even at his wedding.

Jody Morris was though.

So you have deducted that because Wayne Bridge may not have been at John Terry's wedding there is no chance Terry might have contact Bridge about a possible move to City in January.

Yeah its the best ive got really

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

[qu

and for terry to have alledgedly text bridge to "get me out of here" says to me theres more to this transfer

Seriously, do people honestly believe this stuff ? JT and Bridge arent even that close. Bridge wasnt even at his wedding.

Jody Morris was though.

So you have deducted that because Wayne Bridge may not have been at John Terry's wedding there is no chance Terry might have contact Bridge about a possible move to City in January.

Yeah its the best ive got really

It's pretty awful mate to be honest.

Do you only speak to people who were at your wedding?

 

[only1paulsimpson]

he doesnt sign, we have made a statement to the rest of the football world

that what, you can sign players like RSC but not JT ?

that no 1 is untouchable.
and thats rich coming from a rag who has just signed owen!!

or a chelsea who have just signed turnbull !!

 

[Uwe Rosler's Grandad]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

[qu

and for terry to have alledgedly text bridge to "get me out of here" says to me theres more to this transfer

Seriously, do people honestly believe this stuff ? JT and Bridge arent even that close. Bridge wasnt even at his wedding.

Jody Morris was though.

So you have deducted that because Wayne Bridge may not have been at John Terry's wedding there is no chance Terry might have contact Bridge about a possible move to City in January.

Yeah its the best ive got really

Ha ha ha! I admire you're honesty!

I have it on very good authority from a pal at City (not a steward or bar staff, tea lady or roadsweeper etc) that Terry contacted Bridge in January. The same fella confirmed Barry had agreed to sign subject to medical (before this was common knowledge) and also confirmed that Santa Cruz was back on the radar (before this was common knowledge). Because of his track record, I've got to believe them.

I'm not saying Terry is signing but Terry was not happy in January and made his feelings known to City indirectly.

 

[EL APACHE TEVEZ]

he doesnt sign, we have made a statement to the rest of the football world

that what, you can sign players like RSC but not JT ?

that no 1 is untouchable.
and thats rich coming from a rag who has just signed owen!!

or a chelsea who have just signed turnbull !!

And sturridge the rat.

 

[meldrew]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

[qu

and for terry to have alledgedly text bridge to "get me out of here" says to me theres more to this transfer

Yeah its the best ive got really

Ha ha ha! I admire you're honesty!

I have it on very good authority from a pal at City (not a steward or bar staff, tea lady or roadsweeper etc) that Terry contacted Bridge in January. The same fella confirmed Barry had agreed to sign subject to medical (before this was common knowledge) and also confirmed that Santa Cruz was back on the radar (before this was common knowledge). Because of his track record, I've got to believe them.

I'm not saying Terry is signing but Terry was not happy in January and made his feelings known to City indirectly.

TAKE THAT YOU CHELSEA RENT BOYS!

 

[Blue Train]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Well we were pretty good from 1990 onwards and if I'm not mistaken, most of his investment came around 1993/1994 time, where we were threatened with administration.

In 1990/91 you finished 11th. The following year 14th. Then 11th. Then 14th. Then you got the Harding money and it was two more years of 11th before it kicked in and you were a top 6 side winning trophies from there on.

That's six years of mid-table mediocrity, with significant investment coming in towards the end allowing you to claw your way up to 'success'.

You may not call that 'buying success' but I do.

But it's the parallels with City I find really interesting as that's almost exactly what's happened to us (two seasons ago we started to receive major investment but it didn't immediately show in the league positions)... if, as everyone assumes, we actually do become a top 6 side this season.

 

[jrb]

From today's MEN.

Note what Chelsea have said. 'He knows he's not for sale.' (Chelsea telling Terry?) Until Terry makes a statement saying he is staying at Chelsea, Roman and his gang can make as many 'Terry is not for sale' statement's as they like. I have a feeling Terry would at least like to speak to City first, before making up his mind.

Chelsea confirm Terry stance
July 09, 2009

CHELSEA insist they have been in contact with City target John Terry and are confident he will not be tempted by a move to Eastlands.

The Blues are intent on pursuing the £40million rated centre-back, but both new Stamford Bridge manager Carlo Ancelotti and chairman Bruce Buck have said he is going nowhere.

Terry himself has not publicly commented but, reacting to suggestions they had not been in touch with the 28-year-old, Chelsea told the BBC: "It is total nonsense - we've spoken to him a number of times. He knows he's not for sale."

 

[fulhamroad22]

Re: Chelsea reject Terry offer [Merged]

Well we were pretty good from 1990 onwards and if I'm not mistaken, most of his investment came around 1993/1994 time, where we were threatened with administration.

In 1990/91 you finished 11th. The following year 14th. Then 11th. Then 14th. Then you got the Harding money and it was two more years of 11th before it kicked in and you were a top 6 side winning trophies from there on.

That's six years of mid-table mediocrity, with significant investment coming in towards the end allowing you to claw your way up to 'success'.

You may not call that 'buying success' but I do.

But it's the parallels with City I find really interesting as that's almost exactly what's happened to us (two seasons ago we started to receive major investment but it didn't immediately show in the league positions)... if, as everyone assumes, we actually do become a top 6 side this season.

Does that not coincide more with the Premier League being formed than Harding's investments?