cyberblue said:
I have said i have mixed feelings but am not really comfortable sentancing 10 year olds to 80 years in prison .there are many many notorious murderers .rapists ,padephiles who havent served as long as Venables .why is it that it is ok for other scum to get out of prison but not these 2
I'm just talking about this one case mate. The sentencing laws in this country are a pathetic joke. Just last week that yank woman got just 16 years, (out in 8), for killing her two lads in Scotland because 'she feared losing them in a custody battle'. Course, she blamed not being right in the head so got a lenient sentence. Her ex, the kids' dad, now has to live with the fact his kids are dead. That woman should have been sent down for life, with no chance of being released. Not right in the head my fucking arse. In contrast to that 'sentence' there was the sentencing of diamond thieves who robbed a jewelers in London, and they each got a minimum of 27 years! How the fuck is that right? 16 for taking TWO young lives, but 27 for robbing some fucking gems? Crazy, just absolutely fucking crazy. Venables and Thomson should have gone down for life. Those Yanks have it right, dishing out 250 year sentences. We should adopt that.