Lancet Fluke
Well-Known Member
I don't disagree with that although I suspect Evans will turn out to be a better than you think i.e. second rate not third rate.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jonny Evans
- Thread starter Tanzeylee
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Sheriff Fatman
Well-Known Member
My anger about this is nothing to do with him being a rag. The point is, he clearly isn't good enough to justify spending that money on him and alienating the entire academy. We can keep Mangala (who is a better player than him) and use Tosin as backup. If he wasn't good enough for united, why would he be good enough for City? He''s playing for West Brom for goodness sake.
Txiki has got to leave the club in my opinion. Complete disregard for us fans when it comes to transfers. First signing Walker (who has criticised the club in the past) and then trying to sign a through and through united player when there are hundreds of better centre backs around.
"Nothing to do with being a rag" in first line then Txiki must go for trying to sign an out and out rag in the last part. Do you argue with yourself much?
Anything in life is possible but when you look at the simple facts that he wasn't good enough for the rags, has ended up at wba and in the last decade no big club apart from Arsenals brief attempt no top club has ever tried to sign him. I don't even remember any poster on here even mentioning his name so it seems a bit silly some are now of the opinion this is good.
Happy clapping big blue at its finest.
He wasnt good enough for Van Gaal
Danny_Johnson4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 11 Aug 2014
- Messages
- 621
Every single one of those players is better than Johnny Evans.
You will never ever be able to convince me Mangala is a better defender than Evans.
Having the raw pace and athleticism to make you potentially a beast is great; but he is an utterly abysmal footballer.
Backs to the wall I will take Evans over that disaster every time without fail
Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,849
That second part is about Txiki, not Johnny Evans."Nothing to do with being a rag" in first line then Txiki must go for trying to sign an out and out rag in the last part. Do you argue with yourself much?
I don't want City to sign him because he isn't good enough. I don't like Txiki because he doesn't give a shit about City fans.
burning blue soul
Well-Known Member
He wasnt good enough for Van Gaal
yes, well his filosofee just couldnt accommodate little johnny, and van dick knew what he was talking about, he had it all written down in diagrams and pie charts!!!
OB1
Well-Known Member
Pep thought chygryskiy would be a great signing. He does make mistakes.
This kind of crap is plain boring: every fucking manager and DoF gets it wrong in the transfer market: players quite often don't work out for all sorts of reasons. And club's like our rarely buy players based on one person's opinion. Pep and Txiki don't just sit in a room and pull players' names out of the air.
Manchester33
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2012
- Messages
- 6,849
I class transfer speculation linking City to Johnny Evans as 'Abject Fuckwittery'.Just saw this feeble-minded post in the dictionary under the heading "Abject fuckwittery".
Any City fan who wants him is deluded!
blue by birth
Well-Known Member
I think peoples opinions of evans as a player are clouded by the fact that he is/was a rag. We always look at them as worse than they actually are.
He wasn't good enough for a crap rag team a few years ago so do you honestly think he's improved by playing for the mackems and baggies and is good enough for us?
In all seriousness and being honest and removing the fact that he's a rag I honestly don't think he's anywhere near the standard we require.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.