You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Jose Mourinho's last home league defeat
- Thread starter There is a Light
- Start date
buzzer1 said:Mancio said:of course. credit for the results. insult for the style , the manner , the man management (ask balo) , and particularly the shameful way of leave.
Was it worth it?
no.
Mancio said:
Wow, are you serious? you won the treble man, and it's not as if he ruined your club beyond repair. That is some statement Mancio.
Sigh
Well-Known Member
Don't want him. Proves you have a weak mentality if you do.
Apparently, to some.
Apparently, to some.
howfen blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 850
If mancini set fire to an orphanage using the bodies of the dead puppies he'd just murdered to get the fire started it wouldn't be his fault according to mancio!! At the end of the day mouriniho was brought into inter to win the champions league and he achieved it and is a hero in Milan for what he achieved.
howfen blue said:If mancini set fire to an orphanage using the bodies of the dead puppies he'd just murdered to get the fire started it wouldn't be his fault according to mancio!! At the end of the day mouriniho was brought into inter to win the champions league and he achieved it and is a hero in Milan for what he achieved.
Thats what i thought, tremendous achievement, tremendous Manager with pure
Pedigree.
Surely people can't hold the treble against him for the treatment of Ballo? i mean lets be fair here, Jose was justified, surely? Look at his record.
buzzer1 said:Mancio said:
Wow, are you serious? you won the treble man, and it's not as if he ruined your club beyond repair. That is some statement Mancio.
well i can see where you come from so i'll try to explain. there are two points .
a) here in italy we have a different vision of managers from you English people , for you the manager is ALL , for us the manager (coach here) is just a part of a ALL that is the club , he has a role , very important , but we dont see a coach as more important than the team. we think if you have a great team (great players) you can change the coach and still win. history of great club show how a lot of times a coach leave but the team still win. and mourinho when first come at Inter get the largely best italian team/group of players , so he didnt had to build , that is the real difficult thing.
b) mourinho is a people i would name as "extreme" , he is a man for the immediate and his work is "win NOW oriented". he is very good to do it , but he do it with a lack of correctness and style that i (personally) dont like . but most of all on his way he isnt interested in the future of the club , he is just interested in HIS image and future. here at inter he has burned two guys , santon and balotelli , that a different coach could have developed as the future of the club , expecially in a time where is very difficult find very good youngers and almost impossible buy the world players when they are finished article.
I hope that's what I wrote is understandable , if not feel free to ask me mate.
howfen blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2010
- Messages
- 850
Mancio am I not right in saying that while mouriniho was there he lost his best player ibra and with that Money bought the core of the team that won the champions league lucio, Schneider, eto and milito??
howfen blue said:Mancio am I not right in saying that while mouriniho was there he lost his best player ibra and with that Money bought the core of the team that won the champions league lucio, Schneider, eto and milito??
no. motta and milito were owner signs. then mourinho was not satisfied and wanted carvalho lampard and deco. but chelsea asked too many millions for inter resources so inter sport director signs lucio . then ibra want go to barca and luckily inter get eto'o (the true inter success key) and the money for sign sneijder becouse inter sport director sayd "deco is too old".
Mancio said:buzzer1 said:Wow, are you serious? you won the treble man, and it's not as if he ruined your club beyond repair. That is some statement Mancio.
well i can see where you come from so i'll try to explain. there are two points .
a) here in italy we have a different vision of managers from you English people , for you the manager is ALL , for us the manager (coach here) is just a part of a ALL that is the club , he has a role , very important , but we dont see a coach as more important than the team. we think if you have a great team (great players) you can change the coach and still win. history of great club show how a lot of times a coach leave but the team still win. and mourinho when first come at Inter get the largely best italian team/group of players , so he didnt had to build , that is the real difficult thing.
b) mourinho is a people i would name as "extreme" , he is a man for the immediate and his work is "win NOW oriented". he is very good to do it , but he do it with a lack of correctness and style that i (personally) dont like . but most of all on his way he isnt interested in the future of the club , he is just interested in HIS image and future. here at inter he has burned two guys , santon and balotelli , that a different coach could have developed as the future of the club , expecially in a time where is very difficult find very good youngers and almost impossible buy the world players when they are finished article.
I hope that's what I wrote is understandable , if not feel free to ask me mate.
Don't get me wrong mate but we don'y suffer fools here at City, we don't like the Billy big Balls attitude and have in the past voiced our displeasure at the way certain youngsters have been treated and thought certain youngsters desrerved a better chance, but when the manager has won the treble and against all odds, the new man gets the same group of players and fails, miserably. Jose' record speaks for itself, the guy is a Winner and as i said, he left the club a lot healthier than when he arrived(trophy wise).
The only thing that i don't like, if true of course is the so-called whoring hiself to the Rags or maybe the Rats(lvpool) if they had investment, that is my only problem with Jose, if true.
PS, great bit of buisness with E'to(sp).