mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
how is that being measured?It’s doing both, it’s pissing some people off more and furthering others to their support. They’ll take the former as long as they get some of the latter.
how is that being measured?It’s doing both, it’s pissing some people off more and furthering others to their support. They’ll take the former as long as they get some of the latter.
So not many. Their protests seem to work for them as this thread is far more active than the two other groups’ on here, if they have them at all.Greenpeace
CND
how is that being measured?
I suspect the conversations keep happening because of the absurdity of their protests, not because of what they are protesting aboutBy them? I imagine by contacts and sign ups. Personally I see both of those things happening in people I know. Also means the conversations keep happening.
So if it is working, what real change have they made to the environment?So not many. Their protests seem to work for them as this thread is far more active than the two other groups’ on here, if they have them at all.
That’s a question you’d have to ask them. I’m not their spokesperson, I just support their right to protest.So if it is working, what real change have they made to the environment?
So if it is working, what real change have they made to the environment?
I suspect the conversations keep happening because of the absurdity of their protests, not because of what they are protesting about
I don't have an issue with their right to protest, I simply think they are going to get a hiding if they continue their preferred method pissing off the publicThat’s a question you’d have to ask them. I’m not their spokesperson, I just support their right to protest.
It didn't on TV this morning, it was more about discussing the financial losses to those affectedIt’ll always turn into what they are protesting about.