chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 26,919
Monday 5 October, 23:59
Yeah don't understand this stubbornness from our board knowing that they already missed out on a priority target the season before and it cost them dearly. Fair enough they are not wanting to pay the quoted price but at least don't stick to the same offer knowing it won't work. Season upon us and not done yet, either be done with or move on imo. Very annoying to follow this.at what point DO we move on though? We should have known what ADL was like and it seems we chanced our arm thinking the market would have dropped significantly and it hasnt? The new season is upon us and pep was alleged to want all new signings in before pre season?
As I said before I doubt we have even put a bid in for him . All this paper talk makes us look like Man Utd . We don’t do business like this because we are better than them .We move on when the club think there’s no deal to be done, maybe they have, maybe they have no need to . We haven’t the faintest idea where we are with the deal so can’t say whether there is any need to move on or not.
Better than the orange he usually gets.Maybe he's going over to pull him off at half time.
How hard can this transfer be? If he’s worth 60 then he’s worth 70. What’s the cost of not doing the deal?
Are we seriously suggesting we play away at Wolves with Ake and Fern at the back?
Ake and Stones?
There is no confirmation that Laporte cant play either at the moment is there due to his quarantine (along with Mahrez) -
Ake's pace against the wolves break away would be very useful actually.....along with Walker he is now our fastest defender (even if we get Koulibaly)
How hard can this transfer be? If he’s worth 60 then he’s worth 70. What’s the cost of not doing the deal?
Are we seriously suggesting we play away at Wolves with Ake and Fern at the back?
How hard can this transfer be? If he’s worth 60 then he’s worth 70. What’s the cost of not doing the deal?
Are we seriously suggesting we play away at Wolves with Ake and Fern at the back?
Laporte and Mahrez be fine for next week.
How do we know it's City, who 'have to' pay a certain fee ?
Perhaps City have said what their maximum bid is & that's it ?
Or perhaps Napoli haven't actually set a price & City are refusing to bid & be fucked about, for maximum publicity again ?
Or perhaps an agreement re selling Zinchenko is part of the problem ?
City have said nothing. All the stories are coming from Italy. Why, if they want to keep him ? Why don't they just shut the fuck up & get on with their season ?
Zincjenko's agent mentioned it mid week BUT I think it was a very leading question that led him to mention it and not because its something that has actually been part of a proposal as such
He’s 34 and been playing out of position!Fern has dropped off big time imho
That is his position now but he can't play it.He’s 34 and been playing out of position!
But still quicker over 20 yards than his replacements in both positions.He’s 34 and been playing out of position!