Any particular reason why the tone of coverage about her been photographed topless is one of "shock, horror and disgust", when all the other 'celebrities' that fall victim to it are generally said to be "deserving of it" and covered in a tone of "Phwoar, have a look at this."
I don't think that anyone should be subject to it, including her. There's no justifiable reason for it. However, if you wanted to, you can mount a much more robust defence for people whose career happens to put them in the public eye being given some protection in their private life, than you can for those who, by dint of being related to someone, accept a ridiculous lifestyle, privilege and being placed on a pedestal but apparently should be treated with more reverence than anyone else.
The tone of prats like Nicolas Witchell, and the contrast of it to similar 'stories' is a bit much, imo.
-- Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:13 pm --
Sorry, just seen other thread. Sorry
