Difference is Navas has a few years experience as a professional playing in a different position he isn't the most talented he is more of a team player. Kelechi seems a grounded kid but has still got a long way to go.
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Kelechi Iheanacho - 2016/17 Performances
- Thread starter thyer64
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Pep played no forward when Aguero was out. Do you believe that Nolito and Kelechi would not have been an improvement? I firmly believe that Kelechi would have got a few goals and there would have at least improved out goal difference.Stupid argument mate as you cannot prove this.
Txiki Txiki Bang Bang
Well-Known Member
Stupid argument mate as you cannot prove this.
Don't see anything stupid with the argument he has made.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
Have another think then.Don't see anything stupid with the argument he has made.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
you stated as being fact that we would have scored more. I simply pointed out that those claims are stupid as you cannot claim that as being truth.Pep played no forward when Aguero was out. Do you believe that Nolito and Kelechi would not have been an improvement? I firmly believe that Kelechi would have got a few goals and there would have at least improved out goal difference.
Txiki Txiki Bang Bang
Well-Known Member
you stated as being fact that we would have scored more. I simply pointed out that those claims are stupid as you cannot claim that as being truth.
Its not stupid. You are being unreasonable, whenever we have needed goals in the past Nacho has delivered its only right to trust in one of our most potent strikers especially when kun and GJ are out injured. Still don't understand why the arguement doesn't make sense. You need goals, you play a goal scorer, he delivers. Its not rocket science.
Tevez City
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 May 2010
- Messages
- 13,292
I dont understand why the club didnt loan him when Jesus arrived in January !
Txiki Txiki Bang Bang
Well-Known Member
I dont understand why the club didnt loan him when Jesus arrived in January !
If we had loaned Nacho and Garcia then we wouldn't have any promoted EDS players in the first team. So we decided to stall their growth, management had no plans of playing them we just wanted to keep them here as a way of showing the footballing world that we have also promoted some of our academy boys . A very dirty deceptive and fraudulent trick on the part of the management.
Last edited:
If we had loaned Nacho and Garcia then we wouldn't have any promoted EDS players. So we decided to stall their growth, management had no plans of playing them we just wanted to keep them here as a way of showing the footballing world that we also have promoter some of our academy boys also. A very dirty deceptive and fraudulent trick on the part of the management.
Tongue in cheek?
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
If you said playing him and we may have scored more goals - no probs.Its not stupid. You are being unreasonable, whenever we have needed goals in the past Nacho has delivered its only right to trust in one of our most potent strikers especially when kun and GJ are out injured. Still don't understand why the arguement doesn't make sense. You need goals, you play a goal scorer, he delivers. Its not rocket science.
Anyway, we disagree, so let's leave it there
- Status
- Not open for further replies.