Kolarov or Clichy? {merged}

[LoveCity]

Hard to look past Stephen Warnock as the worst full-back in the league. Truly awful.

 

[Akira]

Kolarov is the second worst full back in the league after Glen Johnson.

Always come across as a decent guy but on the pitch he is a waste of time. All he does is whack the ball as hard as he can whenever he gets it, he is the most wasteful player I have seen us have in a long time. Blackburn was the one and only game where I have gone away thinking he had played well and actually brought some quality to the side.

Give me Clichy any day, who is by far the more intelligent and better player. Why some of you think Kolarov even comes close mystifies me.

Kolarov? Seriously? If crosses are what justifies a full back's ability then I dare say Kolarov goes nowhere close to even below average.

And Glen Johnson? Okay, I know many people don't like him, but that guy nearly tore us (was it the league cup?) apart that day. And despite many criticisms, there must be a prime reason why England managers after England managers pick GJ.

 

[Blue Chicken]

For me its got to be kolarov,clichy is top draw but a.k offers so much more i.e crosses and shots.the guy is starting to show his true potential! What do you blues think?

Is this a trick question??

 

[Balti]

Generally happier to see Clichy's name on the teamsheet

 

[taconinja]

Why the hell can't we just be happy we have both? Do we realize how many teams would kill to have either of them let alone both?

 

[Sky Blue]

Why the hell can't we just be happy we have both? Do we realize how many teams would kill to have either of them let alone both?

Well said....both quality players.