You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Labour or Conservative?
- Thread starter shaundickov
- Start date
Bill
Moderator
got to be tory, even the most dumbest of labour voters must see it now.
tufty
Well-Known Member
Are you people stupid! There is no difference between their policies now.
There was a diference when they all started out, with the socialists believing that the state should intervene with how people are living, and should be responsible for taking money from the more well off, and distributing it to the less well off. This was done by high taxation. This led to the wellfare state, and the national health service....all good things.
The opposite of this is what the conservatives stood for, which was basically allow people to keep more of their money, and people's own conscious would make people help the less well off, by starting up more charities which would help people. Letting people (entrepeneurs) keep more of their money would also encourage them to start more businesses and employ more people, so they could earn their own money.
So going right back to basics, your old choice was to believe that the state should be responsible for looking after the less well off in council estates, (or lazy work shy slackers as some would call them), by taking more of your hard earned off you and giving it to them, or to beleive that if people were allowed to keep their money, they would employ more people so there would be less needy, and charities would look after the underprivileged.
Those days have all gone now, and they are both the same anyway so it doesnt matter.
There was a diference when they all started out, with the socialists believing that the state should intervene with how people are living, and should be responsible for taking money from the more well off, and distributing it to the less well off. This was done by high taxation. This led to the wellfare state, and the national health service....all good things.
The opposite of this is what the conservatives stood for, which was basically allow people to keep more of their money, and people's own conscious would make people help the less well off, by starting up more charities which would help people. Letting people (entrepeneurs) keep more of their money would also encourage them to start more businesses and employ more people, so they could earn their own money.
So going right back to basics, your old choice was to believe that the state should be responsible for looking after the less well off in council estates, (or lazy work shy slackers as some would call them), by taking more of your hard earned off you and giving it to them, or to beleive that if people were allowed to keep their money, they would employ more people so there would be less needy, and charities would look after the underprivileged.
Those days have all gone now, and they are both the same anyway so it doesnt matter.
A
A
Anonymous
Guest
de niro said:got to be tory, even the most dumbest of labour voters must see it now.
Have to agree with you ...... Labour have mislead even their own people , and have completely lost the plot.
Time for a change.
MCFCinUSA
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 5,299
- Team supported
- City since 1977
Official Monster Raving Loony Party (RIP Screaming Lord Sutch)
- if I was going to vote; the last time I actually did in the UK, it was for Thatcher.
Make what you want out of that... perhaps I'm a little apolitical in my later years.
Definitely a Barack supporter over there though (although I don't vote and am not registered) but politicians in this part of the world tend to be absolutely dire. Not a job I would wish to engage in.
*oh yeah, Cruyff!!! ;o))
- if I was going to vote; the last time I actually did in the UK, it was for Thatcher.
Make what you want out of that... perhaps I'm a little apolitical in my later years.
Definitely a Barack supporter over there though (although I don't vote and am not registered) but politicians in this part of the world tend to be absolutely dire. Not a job I would wish to engage in.
*oh yeah, Cruyff!!! ;o))
bluemonday
Well-Known Member
de niro said:got to be tory, even the most dumbest of labour voters must see it now.
Please explain conservative policies to a "dumb" Labour voter. Or are you just a tired old man with a Maggie fixation?
Mr Ed (The Stables)
Well-Known Member
Gaudino said:The Communist Nazi Green Party.
Remember, no matter who you vote for, the Government always get in.......
And the civil servants who run the actual job never change either.
kronkonite
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2007
- Messages
- 2,313
share the money around equally amongst everyone
socialism for me
bring back Arthur Scargill
socialism for me
bring back Arthur Scargill
Fuck knows, they're all the same. A bunch of lying bastards, obsessed with trying to out-do each other in petty squabbles and con the public into voting for them. Does anybody genuinely want either Cameron or Brown to be running our country? No, you're trying to decide which one is slightly less of a knob than the other one, hardly an ideal situation. We need politicians who aren't self-serving wankers.
tufty
Well-Known Member
tell me wtf i should share my hard earned with the scrotes who did not do a light at school, dont do a light now, and sponge and think the world owes them a living. I will willingly help the the people who want to work and cant thro disability or no work available, but not some of the knobheads I went to school with, who never had any intentions of getting an education and a job. They were all too busy getting pissed/stoned and sh*gging all the good looking girls while I was working my tripe off. Now they are broke and bloated and wasted from all their sh*gging and drinking they can all f**k off...............notg quite sure where i am going with this........too much Clontarf atm.......hic.