greasedupdeafguy
Well-Known Member
Not worth it rather get bale
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Lavezzi
- Thread starter Blue Haze
- Start date
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
A £10m player tops. Goal record of a full back, not good enough for a striker of his age
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 17,770
Manchester United are considering a move for Ezequiel Lavezzi, Napoli's Argentine forward. The 27-year-old has a £25m buy-out clause in his contract.
Full story: Journal of Naples
Full story: Journal of Naples
MadchesterCity said:Manchester United are considering a move for Ezequiel Lavezzi, Napoli's Argentine forward. The 27-year-old has a £25m buy-out clause in his contract.
Full story: Journal of Naples
Yet they're bang on for Hazard.
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 17,770
alky313 said:MadchesterCity said:Manchester United are considering a move for Ezequiel Lavezzi, Napoli's Argentine forward. The 27-year-old has a £25m buy-out clause in his contract.
Full story: Journal of Naples
Yet they're bang on for Hazard.
who is better player Lavezzi or Hazard?
Have been very impressed every time I have seen Lavezzi and have not seen enough opf Hazard so would appreciate the advice
MadchesterCity said:alky313 said:MadchesterCity said:Manchester United are considering a move for Ezequiel Lavezzi, Napoli's Argentine forward. The 27-year-old has a £25m buy-out clause in his contract.
Full story: Journal of Naples
Yet they're bang on for Hazard.
who is better player Lavezzi or Hazard?
Have been very impressed every time I have seen Lavezzi and have not seen enough opf Hazard so would appreciate the advice
As incredibly different as they are they can be equated. I would say that Lavezzi is of the Tevez mould. He runs and runs until his head falls off. He's always attempting to link up and make plays. He does well on the wing but operates best behind Cavani... but he isn't the best of finishers.
Hazard is a project. His positional awareness as winger or as a striker in the hole needs work. I've seen drop too far deep or leave himself stranded. The advantages for him are that he has a great booklet of tricks and moves and pace to boot. Hazard benefits from poor defending where as Lavezzi is facing 5 man backlines consistently.
If you were to take one of these players on a free. Paying them 100k in wages over 5 years you'd have to go with Hazard. If Bob work on Hazard's movement along the line and teach him discipline there is not reason why Eden can't be a 15 goal-15 assist man every year.
Eden Hazard doesn't have the kind of foot Ronaldo or Messi has. His cross is good, not great. His shots aren't the kind of sweet beautiful finishes one might be used to. Probably the only part of his game that isn't polished with a bit of flair.
The media is hyping Hazard as the next Ronaldo/Messi and comparing him to the likes of Neymar. He just isn't that kind of player. I will say that Lavezzi has a better build for our league. Hazard has a tendency to take a lot of knocks and isn't always wise to keeping himself away from a challenge when it isn't really necessary. In the same way Gervinho has struggled with knocks this year, where ever Hazard goes they will need a physio with some talent.
alky313 said:MadchesterCity said:alky313 said:Yet they're bang on for Hazard.
who is better player Lavezzi or Hazard?
Have been very impressed every time I have seen Lavezzi and have not seen enough opf Hazard so would appreciate the advice
As incredibly different as they are they can be equated. I would say that Lavezzi is of the Tevez mould. He runs and runs until his head falls off. He's always attempting to link up and make plays. He does well on the wing but operates best behind Cavani... but he isn't the best of finishers.
Hazard is a project. His positional awareness as winger or as a striker in the hole needs work. I've seen drop too far deep or leave himself stranded. The advantages for him are that he has a great booklet of tricks and moves and pace to boot. Hazard benefits from poor defending where as Lavezzi is facing 5 man backlines consistently.
If you were to take one of these players on a free. Paying them 100k in wages over 5 years you'd have to go with Hazard. If Bob work on Hazard's movement along the line and teach him discipline there is not reason why Eden can't be a 15 goal-15 assist man every year.
Eden Hazard doesn't have the kind of foot Ronaldo or Messi has. His cross is good, not great. His shots aren't the kind of sweet beautiful finishes one might be used to. Probably the only part of his game that isn't polished with a bit of flair.
The media is hyping Hazard as the next Ronaldo/Messi and comparing him to the likes of Neymar. He just isn't that kind of player. I will say that Lavezzi has a better build for our league. Hazard has a tendency to take a lot of knocks and isn't always wise to keeping himself away from a challenge when it isn't really necessary. In the same way Gervinho has struggled with knocks this year, where ever Hazard goes they will need a physio with some talent.
Myth.
He hasnt missed a game for something like 3 years?
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 17,770
alky313 said:MadchesterCity said:alky313 said:Yet they're bang on for Hazard.
who is better player Lavezzi or Hazard?
Have been very impressed every time I have seen Lavezzi and have not seen enough opf Hazard so would appreciate the advice
As incredibly different as they are they can be equated. I would say that Lavezzi is of the Tevez mould. He runs and runs until his head falls off. He's always attempting to link up and make plays. He does well on the wing but operates best behind Cavani... but he isn't the best of finishers.
Hazard is a project. His positional awareness as winger or as a striker in the hole needs work. I've seen drop too far deep or leave himself stranded. The advantages for him are that he has a great booklet of tricks and moves and pace to boot. Hazard benefits from poor defending where as Lavezzi is facing 5 man backlines consistently.
If you were to take one of these players on a free. Paying them 100k in wages over 5 years you'd have to go with Hazard. If Bob work on Hazard's movement along the line and teach him discipline there is not reason why Eden can't be a 15 goal-15 assist man every year.
Eden Hazard doesn't have the kind of foot Ronaldo or Messi has. His cross is good, not great. His shots aren't the kind of sweet beautiful finishes one might be used to. Probably the only part of his game that isn't polished with a bit of flair.
The media is hyping Hazard as the next Ronaldo/Messi and comparing him to the likes of Neymar. He just isn't that kind of player. I will say that Lavezzi has a better build for our league. Hazard has a tendency to take a lot of knocks and isn't always wise to keeping himself away from a challenge when it isn't really necessary. In the same way Gervinho has struggled with knocks this year, where ever Hazard goes they will need a physio with some talent.
thanks good read, so Hazard is far from the finished article from your comments and has lots of areas that Mancini could help him improve.
How would you compare his pace? Nasri, Aguero, Clichy?
Is he an upgrade on Johnson/ Balotelli?
How good do you reckon he could become?
Golden Question: Where will we find the next Messi??