League >> CL and there's really no question the former is more difficult to win
Look - I get that you might favor winning the league.
But to state that it's easier to win the C/L than to win the league title - is - I'm struggling to come up with the correct adjective...
===
There is one winner of the C/L among all the teams in competition for the title - all the former season's league winners - and other highly skillful teams.
In the C/L - an unlucky result followed by a non-makeup result sees you out.
In the C/L the caliber of opposition you face is far higher than the average competition you face in your own league.
Winning the C/L is far, far more difficult than winning a league title. Obviously. I can't see why you disagree with this.
===
One last attempt to get you back on track towards reasonalbleness...
PSG's sole goal is to win the C/L.
They're by far in away the best squad in their own league.
So, by the metric of it's easier to win the C/L than to win your own league - then, you'd expect that PSG has far more C/L wins than league wins.
===
Apply this same metric to CIty/Barca/RM/and so forth...
No side in European football can possibly have more C/L wins than league title wins.
It's crazy to think otherwise.
====
I will give you this though - the C/L involves a fair bit of luck. Sometimes, by fluke, an untalented side might win the C/L - whereas such an untalented side would stand no chance at winning a league title. Chelsea some years back for example.
Which absolutely does not detract from the obvious fact that winning the C/L is 1-team-in-all of Europe. In a knockout competition where a bad result or two will see you out. In a competition against the best sides in Europe.
Whereas winning a league title - simply means that you need to have the best record against all sides in your league - many of whom are average/awful - certainly not of C/L competition ability - over a 38 (In the case of the P/L) game season, where there's plenty of room for multiple dropped points/missteps - the room for error is far greater than in a knockout competition.
===
One last thought...
Sometimes there will emerge a team that's obviously or arguably the most talented in all of world football...
Nearly always, such a side will win their league title.
But quite often, just such a world-best, league-best, side will fail to win the C/L?
Why?
Because luck factors into the C/L winner far more than it factors into winning a league title.
Going by percentages - it's far less likely that a dominant side will win the C/L than will win the league.
At the same time - if you're not the dominant side in your league - you stand little chance of winning your league. Or of winning the C/L. Yet, if you're lucky, you might pull off a C/L win - but unless you're luck is sustained, you'll still likely lose the league.
Why? Because you've far less games to play to win the C/L - a lucky streak will carry you far.
But against a 38+ game league schedule - your luck is far less likely to hold - the better team will win out.
