Leicester charged by PL for failing PSR

Makes you wonder why Everton,Forest Leicester and the other clubs didn't just vote against this shit in the first place or at the very least come out and publicly support the City case.

These fuckers held the cartels coat while they put the knuckle dusters to good use.
 
Last edited:
Remind me, what nationality are the owners of Leicester City?
 
hertsblue said:
And of course nearly every comment is what about City.
Zero mention of the Rags 300 million loses over 3 years and how they have been allowed that, or Chelsea selling hotels and womens team to themselves
Click to expand...
At fair market value though.....
 
mexico1970 said:
Makes you wonder why Everton,Forest Leicester and the other clubs didn't just vote against this shit in the first place or at the very least come out and publicly support the City case.

These fuckers held the cartels coat while they put the knuckle dusters to good use.
Click to expand...

It’s their own self preservation in the football pyramid. What would happen if clubs like Birmingham, Wrexham even Gary Chuckle’s rag lite project could spend what they wanted? The clubs such as Everton, Forest and Leicester move down and are swallowed up by clubs with more ambitious owners to get their place in the Premier League.
 
I find the PL acting with their customary arrogance, ignorance and dictatorial instincts. Leicester made a fool of Masters & Co, who didn't like it and are now trying to take revenge. The original IC decided that Leicester had conformed to the wording of the regulations and so Leicester's appeal was upheld. Pathetically the PL claimed that Leicester knew, and the IC should know what the PL's rule meant to proscribe. The PL got the flea in the ear it deserved. Instead of going away and deciding to behave with more attention to detail in the future, and think before it acted, the PL wanted revenge, so it appears to have looked at what Leicester did and framed regulations that made this RETROSPECTIVELY a violation of rules which were not rules then! It is as though City were charged, in February 2023, with 115 breaches between 2008 and 2018 of rules which did not become rules until 2020.
 
For myself I'm made up about this. Why? Well some of you might remember a couple of years ago I started chatting to an older couple visiting Manchester who were drinking in the Royal Oak pub in Didsbury. We were watching a live game on the tv and the chat was nice and friendly.... until they found out I was a City fan. The bloke started ranting all the City bingo shite and he's lucky he was an older bloke as the Oak and Didsbury is predominantly a City pub and area. Seeing the looks he was getting he backtracked a bit but I never forgot it. Now they're being accused of similar. Fucking karma.
 
paulchapo said:
For myself I'm made up about this. Why? Well some of you might remember a couple of years ago I started chatting to an older couple visiting Manchester who were drinking in the Royal Oak pub in Didsbury. We were watching a live game on the tv and the chat was nice and friendly.... until they found out I was a City fan. The bloke started ranting all the City bingo shite and he's lucky he was an older bloke as the Oak and Didsbury is predominantly a City pub and area. Seeing the looks he was getting he backtracked a bit but I never forgot it. Now they're being accused of similar. Fucking karma.
Click to expand...
I do remember this story funnily enough. I'd love to be a fly on his wall right now :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top