Leroy Sané

[Sir peace frog]

If his desire was that strong to come back knowing what pep demands from his players, and pep wanted him i would be delighted to have him back, oh and he would need a no1 haircut

 

[Txiki Txiki Bang Bang]

If his desire was that strong to come back knowing what pep demands from his players, and pep wanted him i would be delighted to have him back, oh and he would need a no1 haircut

No haircut needed. That's his look and it works for him.

 

[Sir peace frog]

No haircut needed. That's his look and it works for him.

But not for me, shave it off :)


(I might be a little bit jealous)

 

[Keeper!]

But not for me, shave it off :)


(I might be a little bit jealous)

NO

 

[Bill Walker]

Yeah, but enough about me…we are talking about Leroy Sané now!

;-)

I actually wasn't thinking of you mate, more a poster in another thread who apparently knows more about human physiology than my GP.

 

[Deleted member 77198]

Do people only watch MOTD? Raz was consistently always in the right place at the right time and thus scored a fuck load of goals for us, Sane was one dimensional, lazy, petulant and had as many bad games as good. I will admit though when he would occasionally drift through an entire team, that was special.

Not good enough for what we need and he’s burnt his bridges.

This is just made up nonsense.

Sané was a cracking player who had pace, two feet, good skill, good passing, good shooting from close and distance, can play both right and left (and now also in the middle), and was a constant goal threat either with assists or goals.

Sané was rarely lazy (you catagorically do not achieve 100 points as a team if you have lazy players, it just would it happen whatsoever!) , and was only petulant on two occasions that I can remember in his entire time with us (both were justified n’all) and most attacking players are inconsistent. de Bruyne has stunk the place out with some of his poor performances over the last few years but his inconsistencies also mean who can be the best player on the pitch.

 

[Keeper!]

This is just made up nonsense.

Sané was a cracking player who had pace, two feet, good skill, good passing, good shooting from close and distance, can play both right and left (and now also in the middle), and was a constant goal threat either with assists or goals.

Sané was rarely lazy (you catagorically do not achieve 100 points as a team if you have lazy players, it just would it happen whatsoever!) , and was only petulant on two occasions that I can remember in his entire time with us (both were justified n’all) and most attacking players are inconsistent. de Bruyne has stunk the place out with some of his poor performances over the last few years but his inconsistencies also mean who can be the best player on the pitch.

A on form, firing Sane was probably one of our most if not most exciting player in the Pep era and that's some compliment but let's not kid ourselves there were many times when he looked disinterested.

The does "he track back" mantle is very appropriate for Sane, sometimes he did but often he went MIA.

 

[eyalluvitt]

Always think of that Rag supporting Cardiff player who tried to break his leg, think he got a yellow card instead of jail time

 

[ws01]

This is just made up nonsense.

Sané was a cracking player who had pace, two feet, good skill, good passing, good shooting from close and distance, can play both right and left (and now also in the middle), and was a constant goal threat either with assists or goals.

Sané was rarely lazy (you catagorically do not achieve 100 points as a team if you have lazy players, it just would it happen whatsoever!) , and was only petulant on two occasions that I can remember in his entire time with us (both were justified n’all) and most attacking players are inconsistent. de Bruyne has stunk the place out with some of his poor performances over the last few years but his inconsistencies also mean who can be the best player on the pitch.

Two feet might be a bit of a stretch

 

[Txiki Txiki Bang Bang]

This is just made up nonsense.

Sané was a cracking player who had pace, two feet, good skill, good passing, good shooting from close and distance, can play both right and left (and now also in the middle), and was a constant goal threat either with assists or goals.

Sané was rarely lazy (you catagorically do not achieve 100 points as a team if you have lazy players, it just would it happen whatsoever!) , and was only petulant on two occasions that I can remember in his entire time with us (both were justified n’all) and most attacking players are inconsistent. de Bruyne has stunk the place out with some of his poor performances over the last few years but his inconsistencies also mean who can be the best player on the pitch.

Can someone please explain how the game works to this man? You are ruining it! We are tearing Leroy down here, either participate or get the fuck out! Don't try to change the rules. Pick a stone and throw it at Leroy.