Lescott has future at city+ new contract for Richards

Blueroses

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 Apr 2012
Messages
1,012
Does micah deserve a pay rise? He has been injured a lot and Zaba has been a rock at right back...

-------------------------------------


Manchester City are confident that Micah Richards is happy at the club and will sign a new contract despite talks stalling due to the right-back wanting assurances about regular playing time.

Richards, who has two years remaining on his deal, has spoken to Manuel Pellegrini and been told by the coach that he is an important part of his plans. Richards also believes he deserves an increase in salary on his present earnings of around £65,000 a week.

While there is reported interest from Internazionale, it is thought that Richards's preference is not to play abroad at this stage of his career. The 25-year-old endured an injury-plagued campaign last season due to an ankle problem he picked up playing for Team GB at London 2012 and a knee injury that then ruled him out from late October to mid-April. He has been undergoing specialised work during the close season to strengthen his fitness.

Meanwhile Joleon Lescott, who has a year left on his contract, has been told he does have a future at City if he wants to remain at the club. Kolo Touré's departure to Liverpool has strengthened Lescott's position recently but he had slipped down the pecking order under Pellegrini's predecessor, Roberto Mancini, and he is keen to play regularly next season before England's prospective participation in the 2014 World Cup in Brazil.

Gareth Barry, who also has only 12 months remaining on his contract, may well depart as he is conscious that Fernandinho's £30m arrival means his first-team chances will be limited.

Sevilla's Alvaro Negredo is being monitored by City. The 27-year-old is one of a number of strikers who are potential targets for the club, with Benfica's Oscar Cardoza another.

-- Sat Jul 06, 2013 3:49 pm --

<a class="postlink" href="http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/jul/06/manchester-city-micah-richards-new-deal" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/2013/j ... s-new-deal</a>
 
Poor Meeks, having to survive on £65,000 and wants more. Modern football at times...

Will be happy if both stay though. Lescott would surely have to take a big pay cut to get a new contract.
 
I like this. Except for one thing, how can someone not be happy with 65k a week? I honestly can't think of much that I would want that I couldn't get with 65k a week.
 
LoveCity said:
Poor Meeks, having to survive on £65,000 and wants more. Modern football at times...

Will be happy if both stay though. Lescott would surely have to take a big pay cut to get a new contract.

Found a bit strange to hear he want more but would be understanding if had great season or performing for us. Possibly incentive based one like new ones being handed out with basic wage etc
 
If Lescott is staying then that will probably end our interest in Pepe. As for Richards it is dependant if he can stay injury free and he will sign his new deal.
 
He probably heard how much Kolarov or Clichy earns and he think he deserves about the same and he is hardly wrong...
 
NoahCity said:
I like this. Except for one thing, how can someone not be happy with 65k a week? I honestly can't think of much that I would want that I couldn't get with 65k a week.

I may be simple but I cannot imagine much I would want that I could not get with 65k every three months.
 
Yes to new contracts for both but no to a pay rise for micah.guess he will get a performance related contract like the others.shame for barry
 
Ray78 said:
If Lescott is staying then that will probably end our interest in Pepe. As for Richards it is dependant if he can stay injury free and he will sign his new deal.
We might still get Pepe because even if Lescott stays that leaves us with 3 true CBs.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.