Lescott [Merged]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: official move for Lescott today...

Page 35:

Darker shade of Blue said:

laugh1small.jpg
 
sam221985 said:
lol @ Everton fans thinking they can go to the FA when they made the deal public.

surely that first little logical hurdle must make it apparent to all but the very thickest of them that they can't?! the mind boggles.

That's not the issue.

If you look into the FA & Fifa rules regarding tapping up, once a team has declared (publicly or otherwise) that one of their players is not for sale - interested clubs have to break off the chase.

Everton may have made the deal public, but when it was turned down, Hughes, Cook et al. were legally required to cease any mentioning of Lescott, even in passing.

All the stories about how his wages were to be tripled came out after the initial rebuttal, if Moyes can prove that information was leaked from someone at City rather than being mere journalistic speculation, there could be a case to answer for.

Lots of ifs & buts, it's a murky area typical of FA legislation.

But - the fact that it was Everton that publicised the interest is completely irrelevant regarding any potential tapping up charges that could be argued as having occurred afterwards.

So no, they're not as thick as a lot of people are assuming.
 
blueinsa said:
He has given me and you special mention in his dispatches on grandoldteam stony!

We must of made an impression on him lol.

I wish he could get on now, think of the fun we could have!


I've had a special mention a few times, Svennis too.
 
Ribbed-In-You said:
sam221985 said:
lol @ Everton fans thinking they can go to the FA when they made the deal public.

surely that first little logical hurdle must make it apparent to all but the very thickest of them that they can't?! the mind boggles.

That's not the issue.

If you look into the FA & Fifa rules regarding tapping up, once a team has declared (publicly or otherwise) that one of their players is not for sale - interested clubs have to break off the chase.

Everton may have made the deal public, but when it was turned down, Hughes, Cook et al. were legally required to cease any mentioning of Lescott, even in passing.

All the stories about how his wages were to be tripled came out after the initial rebuttal, if Moyes can prove that information was leaked from someone at City rather than being mere journalistic speculation, there could be a case to answer for.

Lots of ifs & buts, it's a murky area typical of FA legislation.

But - the fact that it was Everton that publicised the interest is completely irrelevant regarding any potential tapping up charges that could be argued as having occurred afterwards.

So no, they're not as thick as a lot of people are assuming.


Everton will not complain to the FA.
 
Ribbed-In-You said:
That's not the issue.

If you look into the FA & Fifa rules regarding tapping up, once a team has declared (publicly or otherwise) that one of their players is not for sale - interested clubs have to break off the chase.

Which rule is this? If you're going to make the claim lets here you back it up with facts please.

And if Moyes is saying no, and Kenright is saying yes who determines whether the rule has been broken?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.