Lionel Messi | Joins Inter Miami (pg4111)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would you pay someone who isn`t employed by you any more.

Believe me it happens a lot - the number of employees I’ve seen resign, whom employers don’t then take off the payroll runs into the 100s. Often ends upwith a shitty letter saying you owe us £x and we want it back. The law is far from supportive of recovering the money in some circumstances- particularly when the recipient says I didn’t realise and I’ve spent it!
 
Why on earth are people talking about van de Beek in a Messi thread?!

Taking their lead from SSN - it’s the signing of the summer - quite how United have managed to secure the best player on the planet for such a small fee is simply staggering.
 
Folks, this is going to turn into an unbearable saga. There is only one option for city to purchase Messi. They most convince Barcelona to sit and negotiate a transfer under 100 million euro. City cannot under any circumstances pay more than that amount and this has been filtered to the Spanish press who are very close to Soriano, Pep and Bereguistain.

It’s becoming more and more clear that Messi was terribly guided by his close circle and attorneys and they are now arriving at a bad juncture.

If indeed Messi is a free man why hasn’t he been signed ?

If he is free to leave why are city researching and filtering potential offers. The last info that was leaked to a member of the press in Spain of the most popular soccer show in Spain, indicates that city under no circumstances can go over 100 because of the FIFA fair play concerns and they are looking to offer players included in that 100. In particular Eric would be a player that Barcelona has shown serious interest for.

Now if Messi decides that he feels confident in the fact that he is in the right, he would always be able to get a provisional transfer by FIFA but the matter would lead a resolution by the courts and that could ultimately leas to City having to pay 700 million euros. There is absolutely ZERO chances that city will take that chance if Messi’s father this coming Wednesday does not reach a deal with Barcelonas president.

Barcelona’s president and club and at this juncture are not willing to let him leave for 100 under any circumstances.

Messi’s dad is in Rosario and he will arrive and meet with Barcelona on Wednesday or the latest thursday. This is a key date in terms of seeing how serious Barcelona is about their stance. Mind you Barcelona are in dire need of money to balance their sheet in order for the current president and him executives not to be financially responsible with their own assets for the losses, because these assets were used as collateral to obtain loans.

Messi made a clumsy mistake of challenging the club in the hopes that the president would fold with the social pressure and because he only has a couple of months of his tenure left, Barcelona’s president who is worn with Messi constant threats throughout the year has said, not this time pal.

Messi right now is not in a good spot and it’s starting to show by the hour. He’s very very close to signing with city; but it’s all a smoke screen until Barcelona caves in.

For me personally, it feels like Messi holds all the cards to be fair.

Great response!
 
How can you announce Messi though? Surely it can't be the same way we announce everyone else? With a picture of them signing the contract.

An image of Messi sat at a piano... Messi stands up and pushes the piano away and it falls off the stage and smashes... explodes etc... and Messi in full City kit says... “I’ve come to Manchester to play football”....
 
Have a read of this post.....some really interesting points from someone who seems to know what they’re taking about when it comes to player contractual disputes:




Sounds like the Webster ruling and invoking article 17 is our best bet! It has been used successfully in the past and it applies to Messi in this instance as he was over 28 when he signed his contract, and he has served over 3 years of said contract.

In essence, this means he is entitled to walk away and sign for free for another club under this ruling. The only ramification is that compensation may be due to Barça in future. However, the value of any compensation due would be much lower than the £100 million city are prepared to pay.
 
Nugent was the one Pearce fucked up not Macken. He managed that by himself


Nugnet was the 1 England cap but had done well under pearce for the u21s and certainly not ruined by Pearce, but neither was MAcken he was well on his way out when Pearce came in and always injured. It would be like saying Pearce ruined Weaver.
 
An image of Messi sat at a piano... Messi stands up and pushes the piano away and it falls off the stage and smashes... explodes etc... and Messi in full City kit says... “I’ve come to Manchester to play football”....
That would proper boil some piss and innovative & new, we've done Welcome to Manchester already.
 
Have a read of this post.....some really interesting points from someone who seems to know what they’re taking about when it comes to player contractual disputes:




Sounds like the Webster ruling and invoking article 17 is our best bet! It has been used successfully in the past and it applies to Messi in this instance as he was over 28 when he signed his contract, and he has served over 3 years of said contract.

In essence, this means he is entitled to walk away and sign for free for another club under this ruling. The only ramification is that compensation may be due to Barça in future. However, the value of any compensation due would be much lower than the £100 million city are prepared to pay.


That’s an excellent article - thanks for posting. It does start to look like Messi is being well advised and is following well crafted legal advise and Barca are thrashing around - acting from a position of anger and frustration. After all who in their right mind would want Tebas in their corner ?
 
Have a read of this post.....some really interesting points from someone who seems to know what they’re taking about when it comes to player contractual disputes:




Sounds like the Webster ruling and invoking article 17 is our best bet! It has been used successfully in the past and it applies to Messi in this instance as he was over 28 when he signed his contract, and he has served over 3 years of said contract.

In essence, this means he is entitled to walk away and sign for free for another club under this ruling. The only ramification is that compensation may be due to Barça in future. However, the value of any compensation due would be much lower than the £100 million city are prepared to pay.

My cat's breath smells like cat food.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top