If your point is we don’t want to spend or can’t afford £100 mill on a player thats free in a year fair enough.Yea giving a rival 100m when he could be had for free next year
Yea I am an idiot , I am going to pay 100 million euros to a rival club for a player when he is free to sign a contract in 3 months time and when we do sign him he will be on north of 500k week.
Not only that the club we give the money to is a major rival in the Champions League and is in serious debt.
Yea idiotic, fuck give them 200million
Nah unless its other planes you are interested inRight - am i making a flask of Beef Tea and some egg butties or not ??????
Right - am i making a flask of Beef Tea and some egg butties or not ??????
Yes that’s it. Beef tea not heard that for yonks.Beef tea? Wtf is that!? Is it like bovril?
My point is you don't give ANY club 100m for a 33yr old player.If your point is we don’t want to spend or can’t afford £100 mill on a player thats free in a year fair enough.
If it’s we shouldn’t so Barcelona don’t get the £100 mill then that is idiotic.
My point is you don't give ANY club 100m for a 33yr old player.
The fact that club is Barcelona is even more relevant.
This was an idiotic deal from the start.
Messi is/was coming for Pep, not MCFC. Pep's contract is about to end, should we sign Messi so he signs an extension? If we don't sign Messi does he not sign an extension?
Weird situation , and on one befitting a club of our stature.
He may be the best but he is 33 and will soon fadeI would argue that deciding whether or not to sign the best player in history and retain the services of the best manager of his generation is entirely befitting of a club of our stature