Crouchinho said:With prices for players now out of control, and Ronaldo's price tag seeming not expensive at all. I wonder how much Messi is worth?
I think 250m would be too cheap. If you sell, you seriously dent your chances of winning the league/champions league/domestic cups for 4-5 years. So that surely has to be compensated too
whothefisAlice said:Crouchinho said:With prices for players now out of control, and Ronaldo's price tag seeming not expensive at all. I wonder how much Messi is worth?
I think 250m would be too cheap. If you sell, you seriously dent your chances of winning the league/champions league/domestic cups for 4-5 years. So that surely has to be compensated too
Dont be daft. 90-100m. If Ronaldo was 80, then 90-100 is fair. Stupid stupid money and beyond ridiculous, but if thats what it is then that is what it is. 250m is just daft to suggest.
If Messi is 250 then Silva is at least 100-125m and theres no way anyones paying that, even for David Silva (not that we want them too even try to!!!!)
Crouchinho said:whothefisAlice said:Crouchinho said:With prices for players now out of control, and Ronaldo's price tag seeming not expensive at all. I wonder how much Messi is worth?
I think 250m would be too cheap. If you sell, you seriously dent your chances of winning the league/champions league/domestic cups for 4-5 years. So that surely has to be compensated too
Dont be daft. 90-100m. If Ronaldo was 80, then 90-100 is fair. Stupid stupid money and beyond ridiculous, but if thats what it is then that is what it is. 250m is just daft to suggest.
If Messi is 250 then Silva is at least 100-125m and theres no way anyones paying that, even for David Silva (not that we want them too even try to!!!!)
Considering City were prepared to pay 100m for Kaka, 250m doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility.
If Barca wanted to sell Messi they wouldn't be selling for 90-100m.
If average players like Downing and Henderson are reaching fees of 20m (no need to reply with something that English players are at a premium) then best players in the world should be going over 100m. They should be compensated for losing a player of that calibre.
whothefisAlice said:Crouchinho said:whothefisAlice said:Dont be daft. 90-100m. If Ronaldo was 80, then 90-100 is fair. Stupid stupid money and beyond ridiculous, but if thats what it is then that is what it is. 250m is just daft to suggest.
If Messi is 250 then Silva is at least 100-125m and theres no way anyones paying that, even for David Silva (not that we want them too even try to!!!!)
Considering City were prepared to pay 100m for Kaka, 250m doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility.
If Barca wanted to sell Messi they wouldn't be selling for 90-100m.
If average players like Downing and Henderson are reaching fees of 20m (no need to reply with something that English players are at a premium) then best players in the world should be going over 100m. They should be compensated for losing a player of that calibre.
So Ronaldo who went from quote the 'biggest team in the world' to the 'other biggest team in the world' for 80m is worth less than 1/3rd of what you reckon Messi would cost anyone?
Messi is the best player in the world, but Ronaldo is hardly 1/3rd the player he is. This is just daft now, and no I wont reply with anything like English inflated prices.....Andy Carroll..Henderson..etc. etc.
Lionel Messi is simply the best player on the planet, and in my opinion the best player to ever play our beautiful game. Is he worth 250m though? Not a chance.