It most definitely was being used to substitute VAR
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool (a) post-match thread
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
It most definitely was being used to substitute VAR
Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
Itv just reporting we were 'thrashed," by Liverpool today.
The last straw for me. "thrashed" by 2 goals in a game we dominated, away, with our best players missing.
FUCK RIGHT OFF
The last straw for me. "thrashed" by 2 goals in a game we dominated, away, with our best players missing.
FUCK RIGHT OFF
Tricky_Trev
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 31,656
Another anomaly... at least I think it’s one, let me know what you think. When they showed the blue line to supposedly show Salah as being onside... doesn’t a legitimate VAR check have two different lines, one for the defender and one for the attacker? This appeared to me as a rushed cover up by Sky and they overlooked the need for the 2nd line to make it look legit. Am I going mad or is this a fair comment?
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
If that's the case then how the fuck can they claim to be impartial (not that the PiGMOL are impartial, even though they claim to be)?It most definitely was being used to substitute VAR
Watch the first goal on MOTD. Despite the handball and Walker out of position all Stones has to do is step across mane, at worst a booking and a harmless free,. Oh no johnny boy retreats like the tide and from there on were in trouble. Even then a schoolboy would have cleared the danger. defend him all you like but Gundogan is a Liability and a coward, as long as Pep continues playing him Don't expect things to improve anytime soon. Dippers were bang average to boot.
Stones always backs off. I saw Walker giving him a bollocking in the first half. He isn't the answer for us, he has been here four years yet is still as weak as fuck and at times brain dead.
East Level 2
Well-Known Member
Does anybody think that VAR couldn't give the early penalty because it would look ridiculous to cancel Liverpool's goal and take the play back to the other end of the pitch?
It's the sort of situation dismissed as "theoretical only" when VAR was introduced, but it certainly came to life today.
It's the sort of situation dismissed as "theoretical only" when VAR was introduced, but it certainly came to life today.
Kun should also have squared the ball to keV.
That's 2-3 to us then.
Aguero had a stinker of a game.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
Absolutely fair. There are some serious anomalies with the way todays game was officiated.Another anomaly... at least I think it’s one, let me know what you think. When they showed the blue line to supposedly show Salah as being onside... doesn’t a legitimate VAR check have two different lines, one for the defender and one for the attacker? This appeared to me as a rushed cover up by Sky and they overlooked the need for the 2nd line to make it look legit. Am I going mad or is this a fair comment?
Another anomaly... at least I think it’s one, let me know what you think. When they showed the blue line to supposedly show Salah as being onside... doesn’t a legitimate VAR check have two different lines, one for the defender and one for the attacker? This appeared to me as a rushed cover up by Sky and they overlooked the need for the 2nd line to make it look legit. Am I going mad or is this a fair comment?
The blue line, like the first handball, was not VAR. It was the technology that sky use and have used previously before it's introduction this year.
If that's the case then how the fuck can they claim to be impartial (not that the PiGMOL are impartial, even though they claim to be)?
They are not impartial. They are sky and they fucking loaded. As are the Premier League.
Is there a relationship there? I believe there is, yes.