You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Liverpool are right, we can never equal their history.
- Thread starter yaba daba BLUUUUUE
- Start date
yaba daba BLUUUUUE
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 397
got any links?Balti said:they were bankrolled to success by Littlewoods pools a long time before the Premier League was formed
lancs blue
Well-Known Member
Surely the funniest part of Liverpool's history is that they - along with the rags and Arsenal - were the prime movers in the formation of the Premier League but they've never yet managed to win the bloody thing!
JoeMercer'sWay
Well-Known Member
er...no
history is facts, if the facts one day say.
Manchester City-19 league titles, 10 Champions Leagues, 12 FA Cups, 8 League Cups, 6 UEFA Super Cups, 2 World Club Cups, we'd be the most successful club in history on the current stats.
history is facts, if the facts one day say.
Manchester City-19 league titles, 10 Champions Leagues, 12 FA Cups, 8 League Cups, 6 UEFA Super Cups, 2 World Club Cups, we'd be the most successful club in history on the current stats.
bakerdave76
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Feb 2009
- Messages
- 4,730
and
Balti said:they were bankrolled to success by Littlewoods pools a long time before the Premier League was formed
Liverpool won most of their titles in the 70s and 80s. On top of any external cash coming in, their success bred success in a similar way to Utd/Arsenal during the premier years.
While the money was shared out more evenly than today, Liverpool still had the consistent big crowds plus the extra cash that came from winning the league, cups and Euro trophies. It wasn't as extreme as now, and the rest of the league was much more evenly matched, but Liverpool had a small financial edge and as the BIG ONE they were also the most attractive transfer for most players.
Where they compare favourably with United is that the margin between then and the other teams was smaller, so it still a reasonable achievement to stay on top. With United and Arsenal it was simply a matter of being at the top at the right time. By the mid 90's they were just competing with each other, and had such a financial advantage, that it would have taken a truly bad manager for either team to have failed.
BlueMo'
Well-Known Member
Quite frankly i'm fed up hearing about Liverpools history, liverpools debt,
Liverpools takeover.
I honestly couldn't give a fcuk.
Liverpools takeover.
I honestly couldn't give a fcuk.
By the way the "World Series" isn't a global competition that only the Yank's take part in.
Originally back in the day, the play off's were sponsored by the World Newspaper. Hence the World Series
Long since dissolved but the name stuck....
I personally don't want to emulate anyone elses history. Lets make our own!
Originally back in the day, the play off's were sponsored by the World Newspaper. Hence the World Series
Long since dissolved but the name stuck....
I personally don't want to emulate anyone elses history. Lets make our own!
Totnes Blue
Well-Known Member
Dale Blue2 said:By the way the "World Series" isn't a global competition that only the Yank's take part in.
Originally back in the day, the play off's were sponsored by the World Newspaper. Hence the World Series
Long since dissolved but the name stuck....
I personally don't want to emulate anyone elses history. Lets make our own!
The Yanks even call the superbowl the "world championship"....Twats.
bluemoon27
Well-Known Member
and for all there history how many scousers so desparately want to win the premiership