Liverpool thread 2017/18

[Gorton_Tubster]

If that was a City player it would be all over tyhe media now. The fact he didnt make contact makes no difference, violent conduct is wanting to cause injury. As it is, if it is either Kane or Salah they dont want to know

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

He will not get banned for that and he shouldn't. Had he made contact then he should but it was petulant and he missed.

I really hope they lose in the final to Real or Bayern and finish 5th. I think Roma will beat them but go out but those Roma players will give them one hell of a test and one hell of a kicking too and good luck to any ref making decisions that go against Roma!

Intent is sufficient under the laws.

 

[PragueBlue]

They have a superior Goal Difference +43 Vs +26.
Chelsea need potentially will have to ship 4/5 past in all the 3 games.They don't look like a team do that.
Game against Pool at Bridge will be important,they need a big big win

If Chelsea beat the dippers, they're going to have to rely on Brighton to get something from them as well. No chance that they will overtake them on goal difference.

 

[dhruvblue]

If Chelsea beat the dippers, they're going to have to rely on Brighton to get something from them as well. No chance that they will overtake them on goal difference.

Not impossible but difficult definitely.
+15 from all there their games will take them to +41 and Pool to +38.
It would be fucking epic if Chelsea can knock them out for CL spot on GD

 

[Father Paul]

Don't forget the Sane goal at home to make it 2-0... would have been 4-3 to us on aggregate and Liverpool would have needed two goals.

We will get the luck and win it next season instead!

Luck had little to do with it we were second best despite some poor decisions. We need to be better next year as well as luckier.

 

[Father Paul]

Perhaps he has realised they are a lying, bullshitting, grief addicted, scum ridden bunch of self entitled ****s ?

Come on those fuckers are far worse than that get a grip!!!

 

[St.Pauli support]

Also lets not forget if the linesman doesn't cheat us out of that goal, Pep doesn't get sent to the stands, which would make a difference in a close game.

Pep also being unable to take an influence on his team during the break I suppose.
We have seen in so many matches how much changed they come out for the 2nd half.

Same yesterday at West Ham. Control back in place, after some messy minutes end of 1st half.

That dippers CL tie will always be marked with an asterisk for an overload of irregular ref decisions. Too much on such a tight level.
Not mentioning the coach "greeting".

Well at least something is left to go for next season.

 

[mat]

If that was a City player it would be all over tyhe media now. The fact he didnt make contact makes no difference, violent conduct is wanting to cause injury. As it is, if it is either Kane or Salah they dont want to know

Gallagher decided no further action when it was shown on SSN this morning. Surprise...

 

[mat]

Did we get the list of do's and don't sky have just put on for the dippers in Rome?

Club are covering their arse with a paper exercise to register supporters travelling.

****s.

 

[GaudinoMotors]

Liverpool and Salah? As if any action was ever considered.

 

[Vienna_70]

He will not get banned for that and he shouldn't. Had he made contact then he should but it was petulant and he missed.

So how did Sergio receive a ban for missing Reid?

 

[The Light Was Yellow Sir]

Gallagher decided no further action when it was shown on SSN this morning. Surprise...

So what? It’s got nothing to do with him.

 

[Manchester1894]

 

[jimharri]

Golly gosh; isn't that a surprise?

 

[BlueMoonz1977]

The continuity and down right hypocrisy of the FA in this country is totally unbelievable. Salah knows the player is there, actually turns to look at him and then swings the arm in his direction...

When you think the FA in this country couldnt go any lower - well they just have.

Absolutely shocking

 

[BigOscar]

I love that they just say "nah" and don't have to explain why he's allowed to try and hit someone. So bent. The only reason not to give an explanation is that they genuinely don't have one, just "nope"

 

[BlueMoonz1977]

I love that they just say "nah" and don't have to explain why he's allowed to try and hit someone. So bent. The only reason not to give an explanation is that they genuinely don't have one, just "nope"

Who is on these so called panels ???? Is there anyone at all on them, or is the decision governed by someone on their own. Why cant we know who is this so called panel, so that questions can be put forward to at least one of them

I dont have a clue, but whatever it us...it has just been proven to be a fucking shambles with that outcome

 

[Navas >>| Fast Forward]

When Aguero didn’t hit Reid the FA called it “brutal”.

 

[ganganvince]

When Aguero didn’t hit Reid the FA called it “brutal”.

Biggest difference is Reid went down

 

[I'm With Stupid]

I love that they just say "nah" and don't have to explain why he's allowed to try and hit someone. So bent. The only reason not to give an explanation is that they genuinely don't have one, just "nope"

I'm amazed they even said something about it. I was just expecting them to keep quiet until it was forgotten. Might as well have.