What Standard Chartered do or don't do doesn't really bother me (but that's just me). Is the evasion of US financial instructions necessarily foul play? Perhaps financial institutions that cooperate in sanctioning impoverished nations are 'guilty'?
We all have different moral codes. My moral code is based on what is good for Manchester city, football and when it comes to wider society, humanity in general. Everyone acts in self interest hence Liverpool fans suddenly have discovered a keen interest in human rights despite gaining notoriety across Europe for behaviour that we can all recall.
What is the usual German expression for tax invasion?
No mate, the 10 wins on the bounce capped it all. It's irrelevant what you do if we keep winning. Not all teams football fans are obsessed with what other teams doHmmm part of me resents the implication that I may not be as blinkered/narrow minded as some of my fellow "red shirts".
What I actually think you meant to put was that in the mould of Nicholas Witchell, I am the correspondent for "European Royalty" on earth.
I won't say or ask if you had a good Xmas, as I'm sure that Leicesters win capped a good time for you all.
Once again, trying to take a positive from a negative, I hope it demonstrated to FSG the need for more quality in depth. If the front 3/4 (inc Jota) don't fire then and unlike City, there isnt an awful lot of goals elsewhere. I thought the man most likely against Leicester was going to be Matip....something of an indictment me thinks.
AFCON aside, unless the chequebook (if anyone can remember them) doesn't comes out i think it is going to be tough keeping up with you guys...but we can live in hope that it stays interesting.
If you cannot see the difference between the two clubs, one forever tainted by mass murder, money laundering, hooliganism and another simply playing brilliant football and regenerating a huge deprived area of a city, go and opine on football in your own country = clown.It is just an insult when it is meant to be one - even if I did not expect your reaction when I used the expression that is wildly used here for it. But I would have had problems to find an expression for the difference as e.g. both clubs are owned by billionaires. Somehow that is not really seen by e.g. the usual Germans - for them Liverpool is a fine club even if there is so much adversity against the owner concept in German football.
You ****.And you insult me as prick - that is not better. And you did it with intention.
I did not see the expression "Oil club" as an insult as it is widely used for your club. So if you see it as an insult it was not intended by me.
But with using the expression I just tried to explain why the conception of Liverpool - so a billionaire sponsored club, too - is different to that of City or Chelsea.
They don’t care. He’s probably from Bavaria and looks down on the vast majority of other Germans as well. It’s unfortunately just the way they are.If you cannot see the difference between the two clubs, one forever tainted by mass murder, money laundering, hooliganism and another simply playing brilliant football and regenerating a huge deprived area of a city, go and opine on football in your own country = clown.
You’ve made yourself look like a right wank stain.And you insult me as prick - that is not better. And you did it with intention.
I did not see the expression "Oil club" as an insult as it is widely used for your club. So if you see it as an insult it was not intended by me.
But with using the expression I just tried to explain why the conception of Liverpool - so a billionaire sponsored club, too - is different to that of City or Chelsea.
Consider it done Roachy. ;)Can I put Utd as the hole in the middle?
I think "he" is a "she".They don’t care. He’s probably from Bavaria and looks down on the vast majority of other Germans as well. It’s unfortunately just the way they are.
I think you may have got away with it, Basil.The Panzer Division?