Liverpool Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
vincent said:
So we are back to Conor Bradley being the best player in the world again. Few weeks ago he wasn’t good enough apparently.
Click to expand...
I think they might want to rethink it a bit, after Doku handed him his botty on a Blue platter yesterday ..

it wasn’t a man against a boy, it was a man against an embryo.. Ripped him apart at will.. Lovely to watch …
 
The only commentator I've heard so far agree that the offside goal was a correct decision was Andy Townsend. Originally said that the penalty decision wasn't enough contact but that was because he missed the knee also catching Doku. He corrected himself afterwards when there was a better angle.
 
MCFC1993 said:
They've complained to PGMOL.


Apparently they've approached Howard Webb and asked him why they pay his pages every week if they have to abide to the offside rule like everyone else.
Click to expand...

It's this year's spurs goal isn't it?

Not pressuring refs whatsoever....
 
JRockBlues said:
The only commentator I've heard so far agree that the offside goal was a correct decision was Andy Townsend. Originally said that the penalty decision wasn't enough contact but that was because he missed the knee also catching Doku. He corrected himself afterwards when there was a better angle.
Click to expand...

Adrian Durham on Talksport I think said it was the right decision.
 
I mean you could argue with no Robertson, Donnarumma still doesn't save it but it's irrelevant.

For a start Robertson pushes Donnarumma as the corner is swung in, fair enough but they're deliberately setting up this play so they know what they're doing.

Then Robertson ducks under the ball directly in line with the flight path. They can't say he's not influencing the goalkeepers decision. How do we know Donnarumma hasn't fully committed in case Robertson gets a flick and he has to divert an arm at the last second?

I can see why it's ruled out, I can also see why some might think it's slightly unfair but complaining to PGMOL for it is pathetic.
 
Would it be accurate to say they feel like they're the victims of it all?

I feel like they have the right to be angry at it on some small level but it's not even close to being the completely obscene decision they are suggesting it is with this statement. there's not even overwhelming acceptance it was the wrong decision from neutrals.

It's also just a horrific look, you only make complaints when you've won despite of the decision, like Pep does. Doing it after a defeat just reeks of bitterness.

Just a shame it wasn't a 1-0, the outrage would have been so much stronger.
 
Liverpool's slump is very similar to what happened to us this time last season.

Teams are starting to work them out, negating the press by playing long over the top to speedy attackers, turning their defenders and putting them under pressure. Confidence wanes, they realise the system no longer works and the aura slowly disappears.

All credit to Pep, he has changed from wanting 75% possession to settling for 50% possession and actually doing something creative and at pace with the ball when we do have it.
 
Crying to PGMOL, pathetic entitled mard arses.
Heard about this on the way home from work and almost pissed myself laughing when I heard it.
When complaining about a decision that was correctly given against them, perhaps they should highlight the catalogue of decisions that have incorrectly gone for them and against us over recent years that have been documented by posters on here.
So entitled they think the laws of the game don't apply to them.
Always the victims, it's never their fault.
 
PiGMOL's Howard Webb will recommend that the PL award the dippers 3 points because they should have won, plus an extra point for the upset and bewilderment caused.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top