Lucas Paquetá

Yeah probably his agent touting him for a move. Think we’ve moved on. He’ll probably go Saudi league.
 
Dialog said:
I’m afraid I have to agree with you on that one. Two years ago, it would’ve made sense—but now? Now I just want to see Reijnders in that box-to-box role. I liked Paquetá back then, but I’m over it. I want someone who can elevate us drastically, not just offer marginal gains. We shouldn't take our eyes off Reijnders—he’s a must-sign. We need to bring him in.
Click to expand...
Didn't make sense 2 years ago either. But rhen again, o didn't think the Palace lineup made sense. And yet it was amazing. So i could be wrong again :)

To me, he is the Brazilian Jack. He Is great when he is the fulcrum of a team. But I don't think he'll rise to greater heights on a top team.
 
Last edited:
Dax777 said:
Didn't make sense 2 years ago either. But rhen again, o didn't think the Palace lineup made sense. And yet it was amazing. So i could be wrong again :)

To me, he is the Brazilian Jack. He Is great when he is the fulcrum of a team. But I don't think he'll rise to greater heights on a top team.
Click to expand...
Two years ago, we were crying out for an aggressive presence in midfield—and a slot was opened with Gündoğan on his way out and Bernado's future was in the air, which later after the transfer window was resolved by giving him a better package. Out of all the players we were linked with at the time and the players we ended up signing(Nunes and Kovacic), Paquetá made the most sense.

He brought tenacity, grit, and determination—combined with dribbling and ball-playing ability. He's a fantastic crosser, specifically from the left side, with impressive accuracy. In tight spaces, he thrives. His link-up play is sharp, and he progresses the ball with intent.

On top of that, works tirelessly off the ball, tracks back well, and is more than competent defensively—not quite a defensive midfielder level, but certainly above average for a No. 8. Add to that his ability to protect the ball under pressure, hence Pep wanted him. Of course, he has his weaknesses—he’s not a particularly strong, out-and-out offensive No. 8, and there are certainly a few chinks in his armour, which I presume are the reasons putting you off. Still, the qualities I mentioned are exactly what made Pep interested in him in the first place.
 
Dialog said:
Two years ago, we were crying out for an aggressive presence in midfield—and a slot was opened with Gündoğan on his way out and Bernado's future was in the air, which later after the transfer window was resolved by giving him a better package. Out of all the players we were linked with at the time and the players we ended up signing(Nunes and Kovacic), Paquetá made the most sense.

He brought tenacity, grit, and determination—combined with dribbling and ball-playing ability. He's a fantastic crosser, specifically from the left side, with impressive accuracy. In tight spaces, he thrives. His link-up play is sharp, and he progresses the ball with intent.

On top of that, works tirelessly off the ball, tracks back well, and is more than competent defensively—not quite a defensive midfielder level, but certainly above average for a No. 8. Add to that his ability to protect the ball under pressure, hence Pep wanted him. Of course, he has his weaknesses—he’s not a particularly strong, out-and-out offensive No. 8, and there are certainly a few chinks in his armour, which I presume are the reasons putting you off. Still, the qualities I mentioned are exactly what made Pep interested in him in the first place.
Click to expand...

Not watched West Ham loads, but I e never seen the plus points you mentioned (though I'm sure they exist to some extent).

Always noticed silly flicks giving the ball away in dangerous positions though.
 
I can't see how anybody will go anywhere near him, especially with West Ham still wanting big money no doubt.

Been nearly 2 years hasn't it since we first tried to sign him, I can't see us going back.

I think we would have to miss out on Wirtz, Cherki, Baena, MGW the lot before we land back to him as a target.
 
Keeper! said:
Paquetta was and is never a marquee signing.
Click to expand...
No but I guess they mean the price. It was 85m before the betting charges.

Problem is for a proven prem player with a bit of something you are paying good money these days. Then you have the homegrown argument if that applies. Hence everyone losing their mind at MGW.

Thankfully for those that don’t like the apparent (it’s all reported at the moment) targets, City have always been very firm on their own valuations and aren’t afraid to walk away from a deal.
 
bell_mcfc said:
No but I guess they mean the price. It was 85m before the betting charges.

Problem is for a proven prem player with a bit of something you are paying good money these days. Then you have the homegrown argument if that applies. Hence everyone losing their mind at MGW.

Thankfully for those that don’t like the apparent (it’s all reported at the moment) targets, City have always been very firm on their own valuations and aren’t afraid to walk away from a deal.
Click to expand...
We dodged a bullet for me, another MF player with no pace/athleticism, something we desperately need.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top