i kne albert davy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 12,224
Well it certainly was from his point of view,as for the rest of the civilized World.Sad end?
Well it certainly was from his point of view,as for the rest of the civilized World.Sad end?
As stated, every incident where a firearms officer discharges their weapon is rightly investigated.I think you're having a little knee jerk reaction there, I'm well within my rights to point out it's suspicious and I make no apologies for it, it's being investigated anyway.
Not sure I was at all, far too many unknowns to be satisfied and for me felt very much like the police were hiding something. Difficult as we will never know for sure probably like this one as well. Makes the lack of use of body cams even more baffling. Lessons learnt and all that.I was entirely satisfied with the lawful killing of Duggan.
There have been members of the force who have committed almost any crime you can care to mention, they are human there's good and bad in all walks of life. On the whole I trust in their integrity but it is not beyond questioning.
Makes the lack of use of body cams even more baffling.
I'm not sure what I believe it's a little suspicious but it could well turn out to be all well above board and I hope that to be the case, there's no need for so much knee jerking... you'd think I was calling them murderers outright and waving fuck tha police banners around... I'm pretty neutral about the police, the government is another story haha.I'm no big fan of the police and I know there's plenty of cunts in the force but you're almost making out this was a hit squad, tho to be honest it wouldn't bother me that much if it was, I've grown up on a council estate and see what damage smack can do, if the odd main heroin gets shot by the police (lawful or unlawful) so be it.
Body cams apparently aren't used by the armed police as the positioning of them would interfere with the equipment they are required to carry, or that equipment would block any view from the cam.
They carry totally different guns though.That's a pretty shit reason tbh and just sounds like an excuse. The American police are all armed and some of their forces use body cams.
Well if someone had said that sooner I'd have agreed it's not suspicious @SWP's back was saying it's not suspicious just because he thinks so(so I don't think he was aware of that either) the press could have been clearer about that but we wouldn't have been as interested had they done that... I guess.Body cams apparently aren't used by the armed police as the positioning of them would interfere with the equipment they are required to carry, or that equipment would block any view from the cam.
They carry totally different guns though.
Firearms officers are generally far more tooled up than the average septic.
100 last night and riot officers were called in but just watched.Will we see riots in Yorkshire because this 'not a bad lad really' got slotted
That's a pretty shit reason tbh and just sounds like an excuse. The American police are all armed and some of their forces use body cams.
I for one would not give the police the benefit of the doubt,as over the years i have seen the police shoot innocent people and or stich them up for crimes they did not commit,i am not saying the shooting was unjustified,what i am saying is a full investigation is required as to where the gun was found in the car,was he aiming it at the police,was he reaching for it,was it in the footwell or on the backseat or in the boot or on the drivers seat,the guy might have been a scumbag as some say,but until ALL the details are known and established as fact i will not be giving the police any benefit of the doubt because of their pass history,we all know about the dead guy's passed history but lets not forget the police also have form so to speak.Nobody does but so far as we know, they haven't.
Interesting you're not giving them the benefit of the doubt at present.
Not sure they have the same equipment and cams as the American police. Just repeating what they said on the local news here in Yorkshire. They just said the cams they had aren't suitable for use with the gear the West Yorkshire armed police carry.
Apart from when I posted this:Well if someone had said that sooner I'd have agreed it's not suspicious @SWP's back was saying it's not suspicious just because he thinks so(so I don't think he was aware of that either) the press could have been clearer about that but we wouldn't have been as interested had they done that... I guess.
certainly nothing suspicious about no body cameras. Wearing them isn't standard practice.
100 last night and riot officers were called in but just watched.
That sounded more like an opinion than an official response from them regarding the armed police force specifically(pretty important where it's coming from)... sorry but you talk like you have authority where you have none a lot of the time SWP(as wrong as much as you are right I've noticed but in your humble opinion you're never wrong... right?) so that bit got lost.Apart from when I posted this: