Ok,just finished this so bumping the thread.
Doesn't a conviction have to be proven 'beyond reasonable doubt'?
Hard to fathom how he didn't walk after the lack of hard evidence and the shocking revelations of mal paractice
by the county law enforcement.
Of course the series was a dramatised piece but surely there's sufficient grounds for an appeal.
The phone messages being deleted give a clear indication to a lead that should of been followed.
Doesn't a conviction have to be proven 'beyond reasonable doubt'?
Hard to fathom how he didn't walk after the lack of hard evidence and the shocking revelations of mal paractice
by the county law enforcement.
Of course the series was a dramatised piece but surely there's sufficient grounds for an appeal.
The phone messages being deleted give a clear indication to a lead that should of been followed.