Chippy_boy
Well-Known Member
Really struggle to pick someone. Thought about Ederson for a joke and ultimately went for Jesus. Not that he did much, but at least he wasn't poor.
took the words right out of my mouth ,word for word , great minds :)Really struggle to pick someone. Thought about Ederson for a joke and ultimately went for Jesus. Not that he did much, but at least he wasn't poor.
Nothing wrong with having a bit of a laugh, mate — we are still City, after all, let’s not lose our sense of humour.
We could have had Mike Summerbee reffing and we still would have lost todayI’m one of the first to take the piss mate, I’m of an age where I’ve had to grow up doing it to survive but Ederson is the true City humour pick tonight, much more than a ref that could have made things a lot worse for us in truth.
Dean as an option just seems like some are looking for an excuse that isn’t there.
I was the same, and as far as Eddie is concerned, many chose him for the comedy award, so I think we’ve just given a few options for channeling frustration.I’m one of the first to take the piss mate, I’m of an age where I’ve had to grow up doing it to survive but Ederson is the true City humour pick tonight, much more than a ref that could have made things a lot worse for us in truth.
Dean as an option just seems like some are looking for an excuse that isn’t there.
I was the same, and as far as Eddie is concerned, many chose him for the comedy award, so I think we’ve just given a few options for channeling frustration.
I think Dean did his part early on (giving the free kick after initially seeing there was nothing in it, then booking our two most active defensive players before halftime, one of them our captain for asking about the bad call) and then backed off as is needed to not make things too obvious, but I absolutely agree we made it much harder on ourselves even so. It’s not an excuse but he did contribute.
I honestly don’t think having him as an option is small time at all, any more than voting for Eddie or Raheem for the irony.
What, has someone voted for Otamendi?Seeing as someone has already played silly sods with the poll, I'll add another option!
I want to change my vote!Seeing as someone has already played silly sods with the poll, I'll add another option!
He was on there from the outset. For some odd reason, though, he hasn't troubled the vote counters. Most odd.What, has someone voted for Otamendi?
You've done enough harm already!I want to change my vote!
17.8% harm to be exact.You've done enough harm already!
I know he was but when you said someone playing silly buggers I naturally thought of him:-)He was on there from the outset. For some odd reason, though, he hasn't troubled the vote counters. Most odd.
Hopefully not with Otamendi behind him and Sterling in front, he got help from neither today, ooh and I'd prefer he just sticks to being the FB because that was the issue today, he was never there.The worrying thing is Zinchenko has to play against Madrid
Hopefully Leroy will be back for Madrid. I would chuck him straight in if he can get a game in beforehandHopefully not with Otamendi behind him and Sterling in front, he got help from neither today, ooh and I'd prefer he just sticks to being the FB because that was the issue today, he was never there.