Man U Ref watch - how many points will they gain?

Pigeonho said:
fatbloke said:
Pigeonho - And what you're saying is that refs are out to stop us?

Did I say that? No, you're making assumptions AGAIN. Like I said before lets keep the thread open and make a note of all the decisions each way till the end of the season. We've all got our opinions on the how's, why's, reasons for it etc. but one thing I will guarantee is they'll get a lot more "potential game changing" decisions than we will come the end of the season - so much so that I'll happily be banned from posting, account deleted or whatever else if I'm wrong.
On Saturday they had a decision go against them, a decision that would have put them back in the game, (forgive me as I can't remember the score at that point), but they didn't get it. Next weekend they might get a decision for them, they might not and the same will go for the other 19 clubs in the PL, us included.

The decision against Nani which I take it you're refering to is in the list mate.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
So apparently I must be either a rag or a rag apologist,according to the warped logic of one of our moderators.
Well you learn something new every day.
And today's lesson is that you can be as mad as a hatter but still be a moderator.
Unbelievable jeff

The only quote from that post regarding on the pitch is howard webb being a rag.
And we wouldnt of won the league without this fella last year..
How the fuck he didnt send mario off for the scot parker incident i will never know..
And iirc we took 18/20 points or 16/18 points when he reffed our games

Webb is a legend!
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
So apparently I must be either a rag or a rag apologist,according to the warped logic of one of our moderators.
Well you learn something new every day.
And today's lesson is that you can be as mad as a hatter but still be a moderator.

Mild by your usual standards.
 
stony said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
So apparently I must be either a rag or a rag apologist,according to the warped logic of one of our moderators.
Well you learn something new every day.
And today's lesson is that you can be as mad as a hatter but still be a moderator.

Mild by your usual standards.

I know - I must be mellowing.
When someone suggests I'm a rag I usually call them a ****.
 
The cookie monster said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
So apparently I must be either a rag or a rag apologist,according to the warped logic of one of our moderators.
Well you learn something new every day.
And today's lesson is that you can be as mad as a hatter but still be a moderator.
Unbelievable jeff

The only quote from that post regarding on the pitch is howard webb being a rag.
And we wouldnt of won the league without this fella last year..
How the fuck he didnt send mario off for the scot parker incident i will never know..
And iirc we took 18/20 points or 16/18 points when he reffed our games

Webb is a legend!
And he gave a penalty in the dying minutes - taken by the player he should have sent off, and would have if he had any pro-United agenda in his blood.

I've still not had an answer to my question about who will be left to ref United games if all the refs got banned like Clattenberg apparently has, and soon Foy too.

I've never had any credible answer as to how the agenda is put out there, the instructions I mean. I've never had a credible answer when i've asked why no-one has blown the story wide open, and made themselves a millionaire in the process. Infact i've never had a credible answer to any of the agenda stuff. I know the reason for that.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
stony said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
So apparently I must be either a rag or a rag apologist,according to the warped logic of one of our moderators.
Well you learn something new every day.
And today's lesson is that you can be as mad as a hatter but still be a moderator.

Mild by your usual standards.

I know - I must be mellowing.
When someone suggests I'm a rag I usually call them a ****.

I actually had you in the apologists camp but never mind.
 
If there is an organised campaign to stop City winning the Premiership,can anyone explain what went wrong last season?
If it's all about money,which institutionalised corruption usually is,then couldn't we just buy all these refs instead,given that manure haven't got a pot to piss in,and we are the richest club on the planet?
Or are the top referees throwing games for fun?
Can one of our resident paranoid folk please explain this conundrum for me?
 
Pigeonho said:
The cookie monster said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
So apparently I must be either a rag or a rag apologist,according to the warped logic of one of our moderators.
Well you learn something new every day.
And today's lesson is that you can be as mad as a hatter but still be a moderator.
Unbelievable jeff

The only quote from that post regarding on the pitch is howard webb being a rag.
And we wouldnt of won the league without this fella last year..
How the fuck he didnt send mario off for the scot parker incident i will never know..
And iirc we took 18/20 points or 16/18 points when he reffed our games

Webb is a legend!
And he gave a penalty in the dying minutes - taken by the player he should have sent off, and would have if he had any pro-United agenda in his blood.

I've still not had an answer to my question about who will be left to ref United games if all the refs got banned like Clattenberg apparently has, and soon Foy too.

I've never had any credible answer as to how the agenda is put out there, the instructions I mean. I've never had a credible answer when i've asked why no-one has blown the story wide open, and made themselves a millionaire in the process. Infact i've never had a credible answer to any of the agenda stuff. I know the reason for that.
The biggest question on the agenda threads last season was...Why wasnt there an agenda when chelsea were winning everything and stopping skys cash cow "the rags" from doing so..

Still not answered to this day...
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
If there is an organised campaign to stop City winning the Premiership,can anyone explain what went wrong last season?
If it's all about money,which institutionalised corruption usually is,then couldn't we just buy all these refs instead,given that manure haven't got a pot to piss in,and we are the richest club on the planet?
Or are the top referees throwing games for fun?
Can one of our resident paranoid folk please explain this conundrum for me?

I don't believe there's any sort of campaign to stop City winning, but I do believe that the rags get favourable refereeing decisions too often for it to be coincidence. I'm not saying that the refs are bent but I do think they are scared of bacon face and they know that if he doesn't like them, they won't ref rag games again. With the rags being the biggest club in the country, refereeing their games is the pinnacle of a refs career. It's in their own self interests to favour the rags, as Howard Webb, Englands top ref has shown. 18% of his career penalties have been awarded to the rags. That in itself is a damning statistic.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
If there is an organised campaign to stop City winning the Premiership,can anyone explain what went wrong last season?If it's all about money,which institutionalised corruption usually is,then couldn't we just buy all these refs instead,given that manure haven't got a pot to piss in,and we are the richest club on the planet?
Or are the top referees throwing games for fun?
Can one of our resident paranoid folk please explain this conundrum for me?

This is the comment of all comments.

I've made this point many a time and yet, all that comes back, laughably, is "They tried to cheat us out of it but we still won".

I mean, come on. If there's an organisation out there doing everything they can to ensure Man United would win the title (which presumable involves paying rather large sums to a number of people, trusting that such information is kept confidential and as well as what other 'covert' operations it would involve), do you really think they would fuck it up so bad that City would snatch it from them on the final minute of the final game of the season.

Do people really think that this 'organisation' would move Heaven & Earth to make United win the league, only to forget to carry out one more important task to ensure their work didn't blow up in their face?

Then again, there was that beauty of a comment last season after the Wigan victory where the Agenda brigade claimed that decisions were starting to go against United in order to make it 'less obvious' that there's a conspiracy going on.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.