Managers need to get together & complain to the FA re: BIAS

[LoveCity]

A more realistic petition would be to get David Gill off the FA board, how the acting CEO of a football club being on the board of the governing body isn't a conflict of interest is beyond me. He should be given a choice, leave his post at United or leave his post at the FA. This is probably where a lot of their influence/leeway with the FA comes from, they literally have a man on the inside.

 

[MSP]

I loved AVB motd2 interview.

"You were outplayed for most of the game"
"Say's you"
"What about the marking"
"Are you gonna ask baconface these same questions"

The best thing was a disgusted face expression when journo said they were outplayed.

 

[fulltimepwner]

A more realistic petition would be to get David Gill off the FA board, how the acting CEO of a football club being on the board of the governing body isn't a conflict of interest is beyond me. He should be given a choice, leave his post at United or leave his post at the FA. This is probably where a lot of their influence/leeway with the FA comes from, they literally have a man on the inside.

If only someone who was close to city was inside and could report on this blatent corruption, we should try to get a city man as FA chairman perhaps..
I have also noticed the blatent favouratism of referees towards Bolton and assume this must be because their chairman is on the board aswell.

 

[oakiecokie]

I loved AVB motd2 interview.

"You were outplayed for most of the game"
"Say's you"
"What about the marking"
"Are you gonna ask baconface these same questions"

And the next response from the interviewer was "we`ve already had Sir Alex on before you"
AVB quickly moves on to the question ref marking.

 

[LoveCity]

A more realistic petition would be to get David Gill off the FA board, how the acting CEO of a football club being on the board of the governing body isn't a conflict of interest is beyond me. He should be given a choice, leave his post at United or leave his post at the FA. This is probably where a lot of their influence/leeway with the FA comes from, they literally have a man on the inside.

If only someone who was close to city was inside and could report on this blatent corruption, we should try to get a city man as FA chairman perhaps..
I have also noticed the blatent favouratism of referees towards Bolton and assume this must be because their chairman is on the board aswell.

Bernstein is not a "City man" rag (and left the club on bad terms with Wardle and Keegan), every person at the FA, UEFA, FIFA, and other governing bodies supports a club but if they are not employed by said club there is no conflict of interest. David Gill as CEO of the most powerful club in the country should not hold a position of influence in the FA while he is actively employed by your club.

We saw just how pro-City Bernstein was recently when the FArce upheld Kompany's ban for a fair tackle (far worse than which have since gone unpunished) and of course pressured Webb into "not seeing" Balotelli's incident so that they could prosecute with haste.

It's easy to see no irregularities when your dirty club is on the end of constant favouritism (and hilariously on the rare occasions something does go against you, there is media outcry for days and subsequent pressure on the referees/linesmen to not repeat the "mistake" with this club), just have a look at City's disciplinary record before and after the 6-1 massacre if you want your eyes opened a bit. Suddenly we go from a typical team with cards here and there to the new Wimbledon, butchers and grafters who apparently have to rely on pure filthy tactics to get our results. 4 red cards, 1 retrospective ban, and 24 yellow cards in 15 games since the demolition job. Compared to 0 red cards, 0 retrospective bans, and 14 yellow cards at the Swamp since the demolition job. Must be that cultured, possession dominating style your lot play, har har.

<--- Redcafe is that way or perhaps you'd prefer a dose of propaganda from Herr Crerand on MUTV. -->

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Nobody more biased than someone managing a football team. They only see the stuff they want to see. Just look at Blind Wenger. Every time he's asked about an incident involving something to The Arse's disadvantage, he never saw it. It's been a constant since he came to The Arse. But there's no one quicker to spot an infringement on an Arse player.

The only way bias will be reported is if it comes from an independent source and where are those within 'the football family'? And once reported, what will the FArce do about it? Blatter will not consider video use to enhance the information refs receive, and it is the only way that you can get anywhere near an outcome reflecting what went on in a game.

Given video evidence, AJ might not have got his pen, but Silva might have!

The people in charge of administering the game have no vision - they are frightened to death wondering where the use of technology will lead, and they cannot imagine anything other than the corner of a carpet being lifted and the whole sorry mess brushed under.

 

[IH8MUFC]

I loved AVB motd2 interview.

"You were outplayed for most of the game"
"Say's you"
"What about the marking"
"Are you gonna ask baconface these same questions"

And the next response from the interviewer was "we`ve already had Sir Alex on before you"
AVB quickly moves on to the question ref marking.

Baconface was on before and he wasn't asked any of the questions about marking.

"hey taggart how about rio drugs test missing ferdinand's marking on Luiz for the 3rd goal?"

"how come juan mata was completely free at the back post?"

"how come sturridge was able to get past evra so easily, was he distracted by the chelsea groundsman again?"

Nothing of the sort.

 

[bluemoondays]

A more realistic petition would be to get David Gill off the FA board, how the acting CEO of a football club being on the board of the governing body isn't a conflict of interest is beyond me. He should be given a choice, leave his post at United or leave his post at the FA. This is probably where a lot of their influence/leeway with the FA comes from, they literally have a man on the inside.

If only someone who was close to city was inside and could report on this blatent corruption, we should try to get a city man as FA chairman perhaps..
I have also noticed the blatent favouratism of referees towards Bolton and assume this must be because their chairman is on the board aswell.

Bernstein is not a "City man" rag (and left the club on bad terms with Wardle and Keegan), every person at the FA, UEFA, FIFA, and other governing bodies supports a club but if they are not employed by said club there is no conflict of interest. David Gill as CEO of the most powerful club in the country should not hold a position of influence in the FA while he is actively employed by your club.

We saw just how pro-City Bernstein was recently when the FArce upheld Kompany's ban for a fair tackle (far worse than which have since gone unpunished) and of course pressured Webb into "not seeing" Balotelli's incident so that they could prosecute with haste.

It's easy to see no irregularities when your dirty club is on the end of constant favouritism (and hilariously on the rare occasions something does go against you, there is media outcry for days and subsequent pressure on the referees/linesmen to not repeat the "mistake" with this club), just have a look at City's disciplinary record before and after the 6-1 massacre if you want your eyes opened a bit. Suddenly we go from a typical team with cards here and there to the new Wimbledon, butchers and grafters who apparently have to rely on pure filthy tactics to get our results. 4 red cards, 1 retrospective ban, and 24 yellow cards in 15 games since the demolition job. Compared to 0 red cards, 0 retrospective bans, and 14 yellow cards at the Swamp since the demolition job. Must be that cultured, possession dominating style your lot play, har har.

<--- Redcafe is that way or perhaps you'd prefer a dose of propaganda from Herr Crerand on MUTV. -->

Fucling hell, that is insane. I knew we were getting a lot of bad decisions/cards compared to earlier in the season but that statistic screams out bias.