No it hasn’t and some of the responses are worse. Might tag the club as there are some pretty libellous statement. Here is a comment from someone else at Accenture.
Data has definitely shed light on this question. Etisalat, ADTA (Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority), Aabar and Etihad Airways were City’s four main sponsors in the years of the club’s post-takeover transformation - all closely linked to the government. In the case of Etihad for example, the allegations are that out of the £67.5 million yearly sponsorship, £8 million were Etihad and the rest was Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG), the private investment vehicle Sheikh Mansour used to buy the club.
The Football Leaks story with the emails leaked by a Portuguese hacker, clearly revealed the ways City tried to artificially inflate the club’s sponsorship revenue by disguising millions of pounds in additional funding to the club via UAE-based companies. City was even officially charged and banned by UEFA for this matter, but the decision was quickly overturned.
Thus, the question of 'football romantics' should be, seeing that financial regulations are not contributing anything , which would be the way to control 'financial doping' in football?