Manchester City 2nd Deloitte Football Money League for 2022/23 (pg16)

8cvlq4.jpg
 
No it hasn’t and some of the responses are worse. Might tag the club as there are some pretty libellous statement. Here is a comment from someone else at Accenture.

Data has definitely shed light on this question. Etisalat, ADTA (Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority), Aabar and Etihad Airways were City’s four main sponsors in the years of the club’s post-takeover transformation - all closely linked to the government. In the case of Etihad for example, the allegations are that out of the £67.5 million yearly sponsorship, £8 million were Etihad and the rest was Abu Dhabi United Group (ADUG), the private investment vehicle Sheikh Mansour used to buy the club.

The Football Leaks story with the emails leaked by a Portuguese hacker, clearly revealed the ways City tried to artificially inflate the club’s sponsorship revenue by disguising millions of pounds in additional funding to the club via UAE-based companies. City was even officially charged and banned by UEFA for this matter, but the decision was quickly overturned.

Thus, the question of 'football romantics' should be, seeing that financial regulations are not contributing anything , which would be the way to control 'financial doping' in football?
basically what that says is that money is only okay as long as its white money
 
Aren't these accounts a complete work of fiction? How can it be that a big club like Liverpool can earn so much and be unable to compete with City, who buy every player they want?!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.