BluePurgatory said:
daveduke67 said:
What?????
Try again in English please.
Try re-reading your post back, think about it and then go and hide!
Re-reading your post back?
I have re-read
my post and it makes perfect sense to me.
I also re-read your posts relating to this. First of all it's diddums not dedums. Its gullible not gullable and again is spelt that way not againan.
I have not been 'had' - the comment I made about the wire brush was a joke about the tattoos. It didn't say anything about believing it or otherwise. The second pic was followed by a comment something along the lines of 'at least it's a real tattoo this time' - a reference to the fake Rooney one we saw a few months ago. The tattooist may have been in on the wum and someone has simply drawn the outline of the rag badge on his chest. The people in the pub are in on it as is the camerman in the background - an unlikely series of events I think even you will agree. I also said that someone may be able to name and shame if he was a rag on a wum.
A fellow poster has said twice that the two lads in the picture have been talking about this for some time on XFM. I said that he was wasting his time trying to tell people this as they just carry on regardless. Once again I didn't say if I believed him or not just that it's a waste of time trying to stop people once a thread like this has started.
So at what point have I been had? By saying this you have proof that it is actually a wind up I take it? Or are you just surmising that it is and have don't actually have anything at all to substantiate your claim?
I've not said one way or the other - you say it is a big press wum. No chance of me being proved wrong - can you say that?