Mad Eyed Screamer
Moderator
Re: On sale now - Manchester The City Years
Thanks Gary, no, I was just curious as to why 80 years on they were still copywrited / permission needed. As you say, the photographer or even the newspaper may not with us anymore. That's a shame that they would prefer them to just gather dust and not be seen. Although appreciate if they have bought the rights then they would expect a return for publication..
Gary James said:Mad Eyed Screamer said:Gary, with regards to the photos you have of Hyde Road, who owns the image rights to them after so long?
Always the agency/source the publishers or I have bought them off. They came from a variety of archives, including the newspapers themselves (such as the archives of the Illustrated London News) and some came via the British Library. They supplied the material and own the copyright on those images they've supplied. The publishers have to pay reproduction rights and, one of the reasons why they are reluctant to produce ebooks at the moment, the providers usually limit their use with further fees for ebooks etc. As my books tend to have a lot of images it would be too costly for an ebook.
I've seen people lift the images in the past to use on their sites and publications but that's illegal without getting permission (and paying reproduction fees) to the copyright holder. I know that many of these images were originally captured so long ago that copyright shouldn't be an issue, however the argument that the archive/owner uses is that they will take the photo/scan of the original (or newspaper) and that will then be a modern day image. As they may often be the only place where that original image survives then the publisher/author has to pay what it takes to use it and accept the restrictions. I've tried to argue against this saying that the original newspaper was produced in, say 1904, and the photographer died XX years ago, but it's not a valid argument. It's a big industry and shows the value in any organisation developing its own archive.
Are there some images you were interested in using? If so let me know and I'll trace the copyright holder. Thanks.
Thanks Gary, no, I was just curious as to why 80 years on they were still copywrited / permission needed. As you say, the photographer or even the newspaper may not with us anymore. That's a shame that they would prefer them to just gather dust and not be seen. Although appreciate if they have bought the rights then they would expect a return for publication..