Mancini Breaking News Part 5 (Club Statement Update page 67)

[Grande Paolo]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Sorry to leave it at just this, but it could be a long couple days.

Somebody I respect, and would be in a position to know, says it ain't Pellegrini.

I can't allow myself to think it could be Jose, surely not?

Maybe De Boer. Apologies, but have to leave it at that, nothing else to add.

Looks like I could be wrong on Manuel.

Sorry but I don't believe you Tolmie. They were talking with Pellegrini since February at least, maybe even January. OK, there's de Boer but he said his family wants to stay in Netherlands. And Mourinho? They met Mendes in January. And only once. Also he's in a complicated situation because of his 35M buy-out clause. If it's not Pellegrini... it would already leak. Guys from Chile, Spain and UK say it's Pellegrini. Di Marzio says it's Pellegrini. My mate / source says it's Pellegrini.

But it's embarassing for everyone right now. City had to sack Mancini yesterday. It's clear he won't continue so... They'll hire somebody in the end.

So Tolmie write at least in which country he is working this season... Or you're writing nonsense. Sorry.

 

[rastus]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Sorry to leave it at just this, but it could be a long couple days.

Somebody I respect, and would be in a position to know, says it ain't Pellegrini.

I can't allow myself to think it could be Jose, surely not?

Maybe De Boer. Apologies, but have to leave it at that, nothing else to add.

Looks like I could be wrong on Manuel.

You cannot be serious!

Not surprised at all tbh. Pellegrini has got options coming out of his ears and it would've been insane for us to only have one candidate. Interesting few days ahead.

We were never in for him dd

 

[mammutly]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

There is no real ITK with City now. Under the previous regime, the place leaked badly, but under this lot nobody tends to know anything for real until the deal is done. The big decisions are made in Abu Dhabi and if anybody who is party to those deals leaks information in advance, either the deal stops or the source is cut off from all future contact - there are a couple of obvious examples.

Anybody who really knows anything about the internal affairs of MCFC will tell you the above is true.

The arguments between Mancini and the board are known about because they happen inside the club and on occasion they've been quite public. This is local knowledge. But what the top guys intend to do about it, nobody knows.

 

[mcfcinprague]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

And this years record....Chris Gayle......119 meter six hit......in fucking credible.

Pollard looking good

Mancini out.........Pollard in.

Who is this Pollard character who I could be related to?

They've kept me in the dark!!

 

[jimharri]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Pollard looking good

Mancini out.........Pollard in.

Who is this Pollard character who I could be related to?

They've kept me in the dark!!

Control yourself.....

 

[Blue Maverick]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

So twitter seems to be running with Mourinho now!! He's obviously left Madrid at the end of the season, he'd bring success but its the baggage.

 

[allan harper]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 5

You'd have thought City would have squashed the rumours Friday/Saturday get the season out of the way first, then deal with the situation and the bad press they'd have got for sacking him.

As some others have said, a short statement backing him would have helped, so what if it was lies, it would have been better than the shambles we've witnessed.

they didnt have to 'back him'.... they could have just said the truth...
'We are aware of the speculation surrounding RM. RM is our manager with 4 yrs left on his contract, we have a cup final tomorrow and all our focus and energy is on that' blah blah...

no lies, no blags... the truth.

-- Mon May 13, 2013 6:04 pm --

You'd have thought City would have squashed the rumours Friday/Saturday get the season out of the way first, then deal with the situation and the bad press they'd have got for sacking him.

As some others have said, a short statement backing him would have helped, so what if it was lies, it would have been better than the shambles we've witnessed.

they didnt have to 'back him'.... they could have just said the truth...
'We are aware of the speculation surrounding RM. RM is our manager with 4 yrs left on his contract, we have a cup final tomorrow and all our focus and energy is on that' blah blah...

no lies, no blags... the truth.

The fact that they didn't say anything was a big mistake mate, how anyone in that department couldn't see this escalating and didn't think to act is pretty unprofessional and piss poor management.

Unless they were told not too as i think some were alluding to earlier but I can't Believe anyone would do that, especially on cup final eve.

 

[grim up north]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 5

James Beattie snubbed us new Accrington boss

 

[Danamy]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Sorry to leave it at just this, but it could be a long couple days.

Somebody I respect, and would be in a position to know, says it ain't Pellegrini.

I can't allow myself to think it could be Jose, surely not?

Maybe De Boer. Apologies, but have to leave it at that, nothing else to add.

Looks like I could be wrong on Manuel.

I reckon Zin's around his gaff and he's threatened him because he owes him 3k.

Zin it's only 3k, take the blow torch away from his head!!

 

[Sigh]

Re: Mancini Breaking News Part 4

Mancini out.........Pollard in.

Who is this Pollard character who I could be related to?

They've kept me in the dark!!

Control yourself.....

SUE POLLARD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Hubba hubba!