Mancini (Formally part of the Adebayor thread)

[HOLMSLICE]

Re: Adebayor

You guys are bordering on rediculous. NipHolmes has openly stated that he is not against Mancini, he has named his dog after him ffs. He is trying to have a perfectly reasonable debate about what is perceived by many to be a large flaw in Mancini's repertoire. Give all the rag shit a rest would ya's?

Yet when people try to engage him in debate he goes awol, dont come on Bluemoon and have a go at our maneger and then go awol when you are asked to construct a reasenoble argument for your attacks on the maneger.

In my experience thats quite typical of the people who have a go at Mancini challenege their views and they fuck off.

He's been responding to anyone who responds to him mate. I respect his opinion as he just doesn't come along, yell 'rag', then dart behind the sofa. He's backed up every argument he has made. There are going to be differences of opinion and that's fine, there's no excuse for calling fellow city fans rags for having a different opinion though. It's low and wrong.<br /><br />-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:19 pm --<br /><br />

I reckon NipHolmes and HOLMSLICE are the same poster.......

Or, at the very least, retarded.

edited for accuracy.

Nice lads, nice.

 

[bluefandk]

Re: Adebayor

You guys are bordering on rediculous. NipHolmes has openly stated that he is not against Mancini, he has named his dog after him ffs. He is trying to have a perfectly reasonable debate about what is perceived by many to be a large flaw in Mancini's repertoire. Give all the rag shit a rest would ya's?

Yet when people try to engage him in debate he goes awol, dont come on Bluemoon and have a go at our maneger and then go awol when you are asked to construct a reasenoble argument for your attacks on the maneger.

In my experience thats quite typical of the people who have a go at Mancini challenege their views and they fuck off.

He's been responding to anyone who responds to him mate. I respect his opinion as he just doesn't come along, yell 'rag', then dart behind the sofa. He's backed up every argument he has made. There are going to be differences of opinion and that's fine, there's no excuse for calling fellow city fans rags for having a different opinion though. It's low and wrong.

When have I called anyone a rag?

Not once in this thread has he engaged anyone in a debate, he seems to just be on a windup.

 

[Rammy Blue]

Re: Adebayor

You guys are bordering on rediculous. NipHolmes has openly stated that he is not against Mancini, he has named his dog after him ffs. He is trying to have a perfectly reasonable debate about what is perceived by many to be a large flaw in Mancini's repertoire. Give all the rag shit a rest would ya's?

Yet when people try to engage him in debate he goes awol, dont come on Bluemoon and have a go at our maneger and then go awol when you are asked to construct a reasenoble argument for your attacks on the maneger.

In my experience thats quite typical of the people who have a go at Mancini challenege their views and they fuck off.

He's been responding to anyone who responds to him mate. I respect his opinion as he just doesn't come along, yell 'rag', then dart behind the sofa. He's backed up every argument he has made. There are going to be differences of opinion and that's fine, there's no excuse for calling fellow city fans rags for having a different opinion though. It's low and wrong.

-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:19 pm --

Or, at the very least, retarded.

edited for accuracy.

Nice lads, nice.

Lighten up fella, only jesting.

Hurry up and log out, you need to switch back to NipHolmes for your next post....

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Adebayor

And with an attitude like yours I`m suprised you havn`t yet snapped up a ST for OT.Seems the best place for your to venture with the dribble you`re poring out.

What attitude is this then?

I speak sense imo and I think my points out before posting, I debate all posts that come my way and I offer fair game to debaters.

I give credit to opposing views and even say fair enough if I feel I'm wrong.

I happen to think differently to others and yet I get pelters for it even though I haven't resorted you insults to get my point across.

I have supported City all my life and I take great exception to people calling me a rag. I believe it says more about the insulters intellect than anything else.

Just to clarify, on my mothers life I am City. I feel more need to prove that point.

This started off about Ade and your references towards Bobbys poor managment skills,due to him "casting" off certain players.
Do you not agree that it was a very good move by RM to get rid of players who would not toe the line ?
Since the departure of Ade,(albeit for a short period) Bellamy,SWP and one or two more,the atmosphere in the dressing room seem`s a far distant memory,when it was a constant battle of "us and them" attitudes,formed by those players who hoped RM would fold under player pressure.
Unfortunately for those players,Bobby showed them who was boss.
Since then the stabilty has shone and non moreso than the Manager showing everyone "don`t mess with me"
IMO it seems to have worked.
Don`t you agree ??

Indeed it has worked in the respect we have an FA Cup and League in 2 years, a great achievement.

I'm of the opinion that the dressing room is harmonious but I debate your point that Mancini got rid of the trouble makers in total because Balotelli is still here and he has had a turbulent season with suspensions and bust ups with players, remember the Kolorov argument? His entry to the pitch to shout at Barton whilst Richards placated the sitiation etc.

Mancini has succeeded to make our dressing room a stable and harmoinious camp but at A significant financial cost which is my point. I haven't once said he was out of order to do things his way, I merely state that I believe he wouldn't have such luxury at other clubs. I ask questions about his ability to work alongside personalities he doesn't like. Quite simple really.

Mancini was right in the respect that we won the league but would he be right if we didn't win the league? Would the important opinions of the board think so? Do you not think they would have appreciated him utilising a player of significant investment rather than casting away, especially when he played well at Spurs?

Adebayor and Bellamy are both cunts but they are our cunts. Cunts that cost the club 280k a week even. Cunts which save us buying other players. That's ny whole point. I really dont get how I can be perceived as a RM hater, a Real Madrid hater yes but not Mancini.<br /><br />-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 7:26 pm --<br /><br />

Yet when people try to engage him in debate he goes awol, dont come on Bluemoon and have a go at our maneger and then go awol when you are asked to construct a reasenoble argument for your attacks on the maneger.

In my experience thats quite typical of the people who have a go at Mancini challenege their views and they fuck off.

He's been responding to anyone who responds to him mate. I respect his opinion as he just doesn't come along, yell 'rag', then dart behind the sofa. He's backed up every argument he has made. There are going to be differences of opinion and that's fine, there's no excuse for calling fellow city fans rags for having a different opinion though. It's low and wrong.

-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:19 pm --

edited for accuracy.

Nice lads, nice.

Lighten up fella, only jesting.

Hurry up and log out, you need to switch back to NipHolmes for your next post....

Classy.

Pm a mod to check IPs. I look forward to an apology too.

 

[waspish]

Adebayor

All managers get questioned on there criteria through thier managerial career by there own fans! look at sir KUNT face Wenger even Moriniho all been questioned about there management! Guess what they have won shit load of trophies.....

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Adebayor

Ask mods to check I.P, never registered before and I don't care for the accusations. Why the witchhunt? Come and debate me, don't insinuate and insult. Like I said fellas, you're showing your lack of intellect and respect, a fellow BLUE should not be tested like this. Bang out of order if you ask me.

Now come and debate, proper fact based points and well thought out arguments please. If I'm wrong and well wide of the mark then it should be easy, shouldn't it?

-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 7:12 pm --

Yet when people try to engage him in debate he goes awol, dont come on Bluemoon and have a go at our maneger and then go awol when you are asked to construct a reasenoble argument for your attacks on the maneger.

In my experience thats quite typical of the people who have a go at Mancini challenege their views and they fuck off.

I've been debating since like 3pm fella, can't a fella answer a phone call for gods sake?

You are not on here to debate people every post that have challenged you views on this thread you have ignored, youre just trying to wind people up.

Not once have you responded to the people who disagree with you, with a coherent counter argument.

Im not going to waste more of my time on you.

I suggest you re-read this thread, the last 5 pages say, I have answered people throughout and put forward my opinion. Just answered another when I came off the phone, apologies for having a social life.

On that note I will leave it for tonight, any posts for debate will be answered and I await an apology for the libelous remark about me being Homeslice. Mods can check this out if you ask, I don't care for the insults and I'd appreciate not being called a Rag, that's like calling an Indian Sikh a Pakistani Muslim. Way off the mark and bang out of order.

I will even take a pic of my staff (Bobby) terrier and I will upload a YouTube vide of Sporting Lisbon at A UEFA Cup game (Joe hart should have had a peno in dying seconds) if need be. Just to rub the low level melts who wrongly insult me. You can disagree, you can pick fault with my posts but please be dignified and for gods sake put some effort in opposing view posts.

 

[HOLMSLICE]

Re: Adebayor

Yet when people try to engage him in debate he goes awol, dont come on Bluemoon and have a go at our maneger and then go awol when you are asked to construct a reasenoble argument for your attacks on the maneger.

In my experience thats quite typical of the people who have a go at Mancini challenege their views and they fuck off.

He's been responding to anyone who responds to him mate. I respect his opinion as he just doesn't come along, yell 'rag', then dart behind the sofa. He's backed up every argument he has made. There are going to be differences of opinion and that's fine, there's no excuse for calling fellow city fans rags for having a different opinion though. It's low and wrong.

-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:19 pm --

edited for accuracy.

Nice lads, nice.

Lighten up fella, only jesting.

Hurry up and log out, you need to switch back to NipHolmes for your next post....

Sherlock Holmes you are not

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Adebayor

All managers get questioned on there criteria through thier managerial career by there own fans! look at sir KUNT face Wenger even Moriniho all been questioned about there management! Guess what they have won shit load of trophies.....

Wenger won jack shit for years.

Mourinho is best manager in world imo.

Wenger can be criticised about defensive organisation and focus, his stubbornness and his view on wage structure parity.

Mourinho should only be questioned about his treatment of Schevchenko, to treat a modern marvel the way he did was appalling but he made his point to Roman. Great manager who had Fergie h2h all day long. Was gutted when Roman sacked him, I hoped Mourinho would nail Fergie to the cross. Would have been good seeing his Chelsea v the United that had Ronaldo, Rooney and Tevez attack. I would say that CL win of Uniteds wouldn't be theirs either.

Goodnight

 

[oakiecokie]

Re: Adebayor

What attitude is this then?

I speak sense imo and I think my points out before posting, I debate all posts that come my way and I offer fair game to debaters.

I give credit to opposing views and even say fair enough if I feel I'm wrong.

I happen to think differently to others and yet I get pelters for it even though I haven't resorted you insults to get my point across.

I have supported City all my life and I take great exception to people calling me a rag. I believe it says more about the insulters intellect than anything else.

Just to clarify, on my mothers life I am City. I feel more need to prove that point.

This started off about Ade and your references towards Bobbys poor managment skills,due to him "casting" off certain players.
Do you not agree that it was a very good move by RM to get rid of players who would not toe the line ?
Since the departure of Ade,(albeit for a short period) Bellamy,SWP and one or two more,the atmosphere in the dressing room seem`s a far distant memory,when it was a constant battle of "us and them" attitudes,formed by those players who hoped RM would fold under player pressure.
Unfortunately for those players,Bobby showed them who was boss.
Since then the stabilty has shone and non moreso than the Manager showing everyone "don`t mess with me"
IMO it seems to have worked.
Don`t you agree ??

Indeed it has worked in the respect we have an FA Cup and League in 2 years, a great achievement.

I'm of the opinion that the dressing room is harmonious but I debate your point that Mancini got rid of the trouble makers in total because Balotelli is still here and he has had a turbulent season with suspensions and bust ups with players, remember the Kolorov argument? His entry to the pitch to shout at Barton whilst Richards placated the sitiation etc.

Mancini has succeeded to make our dressing room a stable and harmoinious camp but at A significant financial cost which is my point. I haven't once said he was out of order to do things his way, I merely state that I believe he wouldn't have such luxury at other clubs. I ask questions about his ability to work alongside personalities he doesn't like. Quite simple really.

Mancini was right in the respect that we won the league but would he be right if we didn't win the league? Would the important opinions of the board think so? Do you not think they would have appreciated him utilising a player of significant investment rather than casting away, especially when he played well at Spurs?

Adebayor and Bellamy are both cunts but they are our cunts. Cunts that cost the club 280k a week even. Cunts which save us buying other players. That's ny whole point. I really dont get how I can be perceived as a RM hater, a Real Madrid hater yes but not Mancini.

 

[NipHolmes]

Re: Adebayor

He's been responding to anyone who responds to him mate. I respect his opinion as he just doesn't come along, yell 'rag', then dart behind the sofa. He's backed up every argument he has made. There are going to be differences of opinion and that's fine, there's no excuse for calling fellow city fans rags for having a different opinion though. It's low and wrong.

-- Fri Jul 27, 2012 6:19 pm --



Nice lads, nice.

Lighten up fella, only jesting.

Hurry up and log out, you need to switch back to NipHolmes for your next post....

Sherlock Holmes you are not

Stop posting whilst I'm online, remember we are same people and I log off and you log in remember ;)

Cheers for the back up today NipHolmes2