You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mancini on Sinclair
- Thread starter Benarbia
- Start date
Chi-town blues
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2012
- Messages
- 31,363
Yet another new thread from attention seeking whore .
Super David Silva 21
Well-Known Member
Waste of a money signing, but not down to Sinclair as he hasn't been given any playing time whatsoever.
the-ecstacy-of-eight
Well-Known Member
Benarbia said:So he's a good player, did well in training butr didn't deserve a chance when we were playing shit
When asked if that might mean Sinclair deserves to play somewhere else, Mancini said: “Scott is young and he has good quality but this year was difficult for him.
“I think it is better if he can have another solution.
“If he stays here, maybe, everything can change but I can understand his frustration in this moment because he didn’t play a lot of games.
“For me, he is a good player. We have one team. For him, it was difficult.
“I repeat — he did everything well, he worked well, he is a good guy, he deserves to play.
“I can understand when one player can’t play often it is difficult.”
Not rocket science is it?
I would say from reading these quotes that Mancini's opinion is...
"He has good qualities; he trains well and works hard and is a nice lad
...but he's not of the right quality football-wise for us."
If I were you I'd be more concerned by the headline of "MANCINI - SINCLAIR FAILURE MY FAULT" which doesn't seem to be a quote, more like a sensationalised heading to show the story in a negative light.
That's a good showing for Mancini. If any young players are being scouted or signed by the club, they can rest assured that Mancini might just decide to never play them, regardless of their quality or efforts in training.
Wasn't it 8M? Unless Mancini had no prior knowledge of the transfer, I'd say Mancini has wasted a damn large sum of money.
Wasn't it 8M? Unless Mancini had no prior knowledge of the transfer, I'd say Mancini has wasted a damn large sum of money.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Reading between the lines I think Bobby is basically saying "if you find another Club it would suit both parties"
He knew before he came he was going to be a bit part player and said he was happy with that,he probably didn't realise just how much of a bit part player he would be.
He should have been given more of a chance in games we were winning easily,ie,Leeds,Barnsley,Villa and Newcastle at home.
He should have been given more of a chance in games we were winning easily,ie,Leeds,Barnsley,Villa and Newcastle at home.
BobKowalski
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 17 May 2007
- Messages
- 20,264
the-ecstacy-of-eight said:Benarbia said:So he's a good player, did well in training butr didn't deserve a chance when we were playing shit
When asked if that might mean Sinclair deserves to play somewhere else, Mancini said: “Scott is young and he has good quality but this year was difficult for him.
“I think it is better if he can have another solution.
“If he stays here, maybe, everything can change but I can understand his frustration in this moment because he didn’t play a lot of games.
“For me, he is a good player. We have one team. For him, it was difficult.
“I repeat — he did everything well, he worked well, he is a good guy, he deserves to play.
“I can understand when one player can’t play often it is difficult.”
Not rocket science is it?
I would say from reading these quotes that Mancini's opinion is...
"He has good qualities; he trains well and works hard and is a nice lad
...but he's not of the right quality football-wise for us."
If I were you I'd be more concerned by the headline of "MANCINI - SINCLAIR FAILURE MY FAULT" which doesn't seem to be a quote, more like a sensationalised heading to show the story in a negative light.
Having watched the presser Mancini did say it was his fault re lack of playing time for Sinclair. Mancini has said it previously as well.
kunaguero10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 May 2009
- Messages
- 7,289
paulchapo said:He knew before he came he was going to be a bit part player and said he was happy with that,he probably didn't realise just how much of a bit part player he would be.
He should have been given more of a chance in games we were winning easily,ie,Leeds,Barnsley,Villa and Newcastle at home.
theres being a bit part player and theres not playing any part at all.
Mancini deserves a lot of stick for his treatment of Sinclair
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
You could say the same about Mancini...;-)oakiecokie said:Reading between the lines I think Bobby is basically saying "if you find another Club it would suit both parties"