jerseyblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Feb 2008
- Messages
- 245
I don't see why we should stop hiring a new manager every 6-12 months. Makes the board more exciting.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Mancini or Mourinho?
- Thread starter mcfcdave
- Start date
The twats on Talk Shite are about to talk about tonight's game and Mourinho's future. Should the Chelski fans sign a petition asking him to be brought back to Chelski instead of going to City next season, they're asking. What a bizarre thing to say, on so many levels.
Gelsons Dad
Well-Known Member
Mancini.
By a country mile.
By a country mile.
foolsgold*
Well-Known Member
why is this even being discussed?
Mancini for me please
Mancini for me please
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
Mourinho every time. Just read Patrick Barclay's biography of him and while it's not a terribly good book, there's enough in it to know that Mourinho will be successful wherever he goes.
It talks about a manager needing three hats:
1) Selection - buying the right players and picking the right team
2) Coaching
3) Man management.
Looking at Mancini
1) Doubts about team selection
2) Seems to be pretty sound on this so far
3) Seems OK but couldn't deal with Robinho
Mourinho ticks all three boxes comfortably.
It talks about a manager needing three hats:
1) Selection - buying the right players and picking the right team
2) Coaching
3) Man management.
Looking at Mancini
1) Doubts about team selection
2) Seems to be pretty sound on this so far
3) Seems OK but couldn't deal with Robinho
Mourinho ticks all three boxes comfortably.
While Mourinho is undoubtedly a very good manager. Roberto for me.
Reasons. Well I am not totally sure that Mourinho is that much better than Mancini. There is nothing to suggest that Roberto wouldn't have won two league titles with Chelsea given the amount of good players they had at their peaks at that time.
Apart from that if we got Mourinho City would get even more unwanted publicity. While undoubtedly good value and humerous he tends to attract too much attention. And while his antics are very funny from afar I am not sure that his arrogance would sit well with us the City fans.I actually prefer the dignified way Mancini handles himself.
Thirdly and perhaps more importantly I can actually see Mancini building something at City. Mourinho has got en ego that needs filling with a La Liga title. So I'm not sure he would stay that long with us. It is after all, all about him. I can see Mancini doing a Wenger at City. ie staying for a decade.
Reasons. Well I am not totally sure that Mourinho is that much better than Mancini. There is nothing to suggest that Roberto wouldn't have won two league titles with Chelsea given the amount of good players they had at their peaks at that time.
Apart from that if we got Mourinho City would get even more unwanted publicity. While undoubtedly good value and humerous he tends to attract too much attention. And while his antics are very funny from afar I am not sure that his arrogance would sit well with us the City fans.I actually prefer the dignified way Mancini handles himself.
Thirdly and perhaps more importantly I can actually see Mancini building something at City. Mourinho has got en ego that needs filling with a La Liga title. So I'm not sure he would stay that long with us. It is after all, all about him. I can see Mancini doing a Wenger at City. ie staying for a decade.
Breadsnapper
Well-Known Member
What's with all this nonesense. Mancini has not bought his own players as he hasn't had a real transfer window to work in so he is in effect working with Hughes' players. Prestwich Blue yo say he couldn't handle Robinho, total bollox. He been playing shite so he's been pissed off to Brazil and they're paying his wages. How's that not handling him.
And we've not been great under him, were FIFTH with a game in hand FFS. As more the special one you same guys that want him now were moaning how boring Chelsea were under him.
The guy's our manager get behind him and stop fucking moaning all the time. Typical City fans.
And we've not been great under him, were FIFTH with a game in hand FFS. As more the special one you same guys that want him now were moaning how boring Chelsea were under him.
The guy's our manager get behind him and stop fucking moaning all the time. Typical City fans.
Breadsnapper said:What's with all this nonesense. Mancini has not bought his own players as he hasn't had a real transfer window to work in so he is in effect working with Hughes' players. Prestwich Blue yo say he couldn't handle Robinho, total bollox. He been playing shite so he's been pissed off to Brazil and they're paying his wages. How's that not handling him.
And we've not been great under him, were FIFTH with a game in hand FFS. As more the special one you same guys that want him now were moaning how boring Chelsea were under him.
The guy's our manager get behind him and stop fucking moaning all the time. Typical City fans.
whos moaning ? its just a discussion
Prestwich_Blue said:Mourinho every time. Just read Patrick Barclay's biography of him and while it's not a terribly good book, there's enough in it to know that Mourinho will be successful wherever he goes.
It talks about a manager needing three hats:
1) Selection - buying the right players and picking the right team
2) Coaching
3) Man management.
Looking at Mancini
1) Doubts about team selection
2) Seems to be pretty sound on this so far
3) Seems OK but couldn't deal with Robinho
Mourinho ticks all three boxes comfortably.
Had problems with Shevchenko and Robben as I recall. All managers do.
Many of the best players at Chelsea were bought by Ranieri. Bought Quaresma and Mancini at Inter and has ditched both already.
I have no problems with Mancini's selections. Dropped Toure, made VK and Lescott first choice CBs. The only bone of contention for some of you is Ireland. But for me he is lightweight and needs too much time on the ball.
de niro said:johnny crossan said:slip of the fingers there dn, I'm sure you meant mancio by a million....
morning jc, not for me mate, i'd love jose here. city have been very poor under bob so its the special one for me.
This.
Mancini.
In fact, I think the Mourinho talk is all just fantasy.
He'll get Real Madrid... or Liverpool... or the Rags... or even Chelsea... before we would even register on his radar.
We might have talked to him, but we are simply his fall-back position should all other options fail to materialise.
We need a manager who wants to be here... that manager is Mancini.
Can we have another fantasy thread... Messi v. Ireland?
In fact, I think the Mourinho talk is all just fantasy.
He'll get Real Madrid... or Liverpool... or the Rags... or even Chelsea... before we would even register on his radar.
We might have talked to him, but we are simply his fall-back position should all other options fail to materialise.
We need a manager who wants to be here... that manager is Mancini.
Can we have another fantasy thread... Messi v. Ireland?
rastus
Well-Known Member
Pam said:de niro said:morning jc, not for me mate, i'd love jose here. city have been very poor under bob so its the special one for me.
This.
Not This,
quite amusing, hes doing better with MH team than MH did. FACTcity have been very poor under bob
Mourinho? cant stand the guy, but he is undoubtedly a great manager. But I am happy with Bob.
Ive always wanted to put 'FACT' in a post
Soulboy said:Mancini.
In fact, I think the Mourinho talk is all just fantasy.
He'll get Real Madrid... or Liverpool... or the Rags... or even Chelsea... before we would even register on his radar.
We might have talked to him, but we are simply his fall-back position should all other options fail to materialise.
We need a manager who wants to be here... that manager is Mancini.
Can we have another fantasy thread... Messi v. Ireland?
Ridiculous.
Pam said:Soulboy said:Mancini.
In fact, I think the Mourinho talk is all just fantasy.
He'll get Real Madrid... or Liverpool... or the Rags... or even Chelsea... before we would even register on his radar.
We might have talked to him, but we are simply his fall-back position should all other options fail to materialise.
We need a manager who wants to be here... that manager is Mancini.
Can we have another fantasy thread... Messi v. Ireland?
Ridiculous.
Mindboggling. FACT.
Didsbury Dave
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Feb 2007
- Messages
- 39,269
Soulboy said:In fact, I think the Mourinho talk is all just fantasy.
He'll get Real Madrid... or Liverpool... or the Rags... or even Chelsea... before we would even register on his radar.
Hankering for the days of Likkle, Loveable Ole Shitty City, Soulboy?
Didsbury Dave said:Soulboy said:In fact, I think the Mourinho talk is all just fantasy.
He'll get Real Madrid... or Liverpool... or the Rags... or even Chelsea... before we would even register on his radar.
Hankering for the days of Likkle, Loveable Ole Shitty City, Soulboy?
Still having a wank over your creased picture of Jose DD?
OrigamiNinja
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 10 Oct 2008
- Messages
- 11,406
Mourinho every day of the week!
Nothing against Mancini but he is yet another gamble, I am tired of having managers in charge who might come good for us but who just as easily might not.
Mourinho guarantees success, no ifs or buts he gets the job done!
Nothing against Mancini but he is yet another gamble, I am tired of having managers in charge who might come good for us but who just as easily might not.
Mourinho guarantees success, no ifs or buts he gets the job done!
We may have a bit of money now and some half decent players DD but that does not make us Real Madrid or even Liverpool.
Take of your blue tinted specs. Jose is an egomaniac. He wants to go down in history as the only man to win a League in Italy, Spain and England.
Hence why RM are in pole position for his services. We don't need to be led a merry dance by him in the summer only to get turned down.
Mancini is here. And more importantly looks like he wants to be here. Mourinho will always think he is bigger than the club.
Take of your blue tinted specs. Jose is an egomaniac. He wants to go down in history as the only man to win a League in Italy, Spain and England.
Hence why RM are in pole position for his services. We don't need to be led a merry dance by him in the summer only to get turned down.
Mancini is here. And more importantly looks like he wants to be here. Mourinho will always think he is bigger than the club.
robbieh said:Prestwich_Blue said:Mourinho every time. Just read Patrick Barclay's biography of him and while it's not a terribly good book, there's enough in it to know that Mourinho will be successful wherever he goes.
It talks about a manager needing three hats:
1) Selection - buying the right players and picking the right team
2) Coaching
3) Man management.
Looking at Mancini
1) Doubts about team selection
2) Seems to be pretty sound on this so far
3) Seems OK but couldn't deal with Robinho
Mourinho ticks all three boxes comfortably.
Had problems with Shevchenko and Robben as I recall. All managers do.
Many of the best players at Chelsea were bought by Ranieri. Bought Quaresma and Mancini at Inter and has ditched both already.
I have no problems with Mancini's selections. Dropped Toure, made VK and Lescott first choice CBs. The only bone of contention for some of you is Ireland. But for me he is lightweight and needs too much time on the ball.
please , add Balotelli to the Sheva Robben list.......
sadly , josè is actually destroyng Inter , maybe tonight he'll be sacked