Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,733
No I don't think so.So if Cucu had a £50m clause, like J G would you have paid it?
No I don't think so.So if Cucu had a £50m clause, like J G would you have paid it?
If we thought he was worth it maybeSo if Cucu had a £50m clause, like J G would you have paid it?
I dont get this the goal post keep moving. When you first came in for him it was reported that it would have to be a mega amount for Brighton to sell. All i know is the media have made up the £50m, that now looks like it true. Its not that we said ok £30m, and as soon as city take an intrest upped the valuation ny £20m.no we wouldnt of gone in for him its quite obvious the goal posts keep moving
good luck to chelsea overpaying again but ssshhhhhhhh nothing said about yank owned club
Of course not. Otherwise we'd have been willing to pay 50M for him, which we clearly aren't willing to do.So if Cucu had a £50m clause, like J G would you have paid it?
Obvioisly not, it’s not hard to work out is itSo if Cucu had a £50m clause, like J G would you have paid it?
Have you lot joined chelsea forums to call them cheeky chav cunts for wanting one of your players?I dont get this the goal post keep moving. When you first came in for him it was reported that it would have to be a mega amount for Brighton to sell. All i know is the media have made up the £50m, that now looks like it true. Its not that we said ok £30m, and as soon as city take an intrest upped the valuation ny £20m.
So if Cucu had a £50m clause, like J G would you have paid it?
We didn’t need Grealish to fill any English or home grown quota either. We bought him because we wanted him and were willing to pay what it cost.Sideshow bob doesn't fulfil an english or home grown quota like grealish does which is artificial but hey ho the FA lives only to inconvenience us so no chance we would've gone for him if he had a 50m release clause