01cravend
Well-Known Member
Sounds like rules made up by a nutty American who has never watched a game in his life.. Ditch the suit and go and watch hockey you fantastic clueless C**t
Still waiting for extra time multi-ball.
These new proposals would absolutely kill the game.
.The offside idea would be a disaster. A goalhangers' charter.
I didn't say anything about more goals. The midfield area would probably get less congested as the high offside line (say, 40 yards from goal) would disappear, meaning less bodies in that middle third as defences would have to sit deeper..
I'm sure I read somewhere that it was tried for one game. The final score was 1-0
My brother swears by the idea that in extra time both teams should lose a player every 10 minutes until someone scores. Not convinced myself, but I imagine Marco would love the ideaIt would not bear the slightest comparison with any of the thousands of games I've watched. I think it would be time to call it a day and get my chess set out!
Why is it that these Uefa and FICKFUFA apparatchiks come up with the most absurd ideas when the crying needs in the game are startlingly obvious to anyone standing on the terraces. It needs 'tidying' up and the current Laws of the Game applied as they are written and The FArce reinforcing them without fear nor favour of any team regardless of shirt colour.
If anyone had come up with that kind of bollox when Van Basten was playing he'd still be laughing off his cock!